Dual using is often considered by some scientists as worse than one or the other. I doubt any reduction in cigarettes is less healthy than more cigarettes though and the science as always so far is disputed and early days.
I've read the hell out of everything published about Iqos. I have concluded that it
A. Releases a vapour with 90% less carcinogens than cigarette smoke (the FDA agree) meaning I'm getting as much harm in that sense as 1 cig for every 10 HEETS. On 4 a day that's not a major risk compared to a 20 - 40 a day habit.
B. One of the main killers in smoke is Carbon Monoxide of which I am now getting none.
C. No tobacco tar. I've blown vapour from HEETS through tissues and also examined used filters. It's clean. Some residue is left in the DEVICE and some discoloration to the paper on the HEET but people have said that is due to the heat. There is no combustion or ash or second hand smoke and studies have revealed no particle matter. The tobacco in the HEET is charred slightly, I'm not sure that is the correct word but it is darker and drier but is not burnt.
There are some scare videos on youtube but those are people who do not maintain and clean the device and just let it get filthy as some vapour and also loose charred (or whatever the word is) tobacco will end up in the heating part of the device.
D. It's early days. The major data is from PMI itself who mislead us about safer 'light' and low tar cigs before. So we have to be wary although the FDA again agree to the 90% lesslvels of carcinogens. Then again to do so what they did before in today's world would be stupid. Things are more transparent and they would be in a lot of trouble one would hope. But yes I'd also like to see more independent studies.
The Korean data is flawed. Really poor science there. The data from the anti smoking agencies is poor, they have vested interests. They use words like tar to actually describe what is vapour and would label vape from e-cigs as 'tar' also. When we think of tar we think the crud that is inside the vapour / smoke / IQOS vapour or aerosol as some refer to it - not the smoke / vape / aerosol itself.
So I do not accept it all 100%. All I know is I feel healthier on it and that is good enough for me. I would recommend the switch to smokers but not to vapers as I believe vaping is even safer. I would recommend trying vaping over HNB to smokers looking to quit. I have only recommended one person in real life to try IQOS as she tried vaping and didn't like it and went back to smoking.
If you vape, stay with that. If you dual use maybe try this instead of any cigs. If you smoke and vape will not work and you have tried many types of mods, tanks, liquids, nic levels and exhausted every option, only then would I recommend this.
I hope that clears up my position.
I've read the hell out of everything published about Iqos. I have concluded that it
A. Releases a vapour with 90% less carcinogens than cigarette smoke (the FDA agree) meaning I'm getting as much harm in that sense as 1 cig for every 10 HEETS. On 4 a day that's not a major risk compared to a 20 - 40 a day habit.
B. One of the main killers in smoke is Carbon Monoxide of which I am now getting none.
C. No tobacco tar. I've blown vapour from HEETS through tissues and also examined used filters. It's clean. Some residue is left in the DEVICE and some discoloration to the paper on the HEET but people have said that is due to the heat. There is no combustion or ash or second hand smoke and studies have revealed no particle matter. The tobacco in the HEET is charred slightly, I'm not sure that is the correct word but it is darker and drier but is not burnt.
There are some scare videos on youtube but those are people who do not maintain and clean the device and just let it get filthy as some vapour and also loose charred (or whatever the word is) tobacco will end up in the heating part of the device.
D. It's early days. The major data is from PMI itself who mislead us about safer 'light' and low tar cigs before. So we have to be wary although the FDA again agree to the 90% lesslvels of carcinogens. Then again to do so what they did before in today's world would be stupid. Things are more transparent and they would be in a lot of trouble one would hope. But yes I'd also like to see more independent studies.
The Korean data is flawed. Really poor science there. The data from the anti smoking agencies is poor, they have vested interests. They use words like tar to actually describe what is vapour and would label vape from e-cigs as 'tar' also. When we think of tar we think the crud that is inside the vapour / smoke / IQOS vapour or aerosol as some refer to it - not the smoke / vape / aerosol itself.
So I do not accept it all 100%. All I know is I feel healthier on it and that is good enough for me. I would recommend the switch to smokers but not to vapers as I believe vaping is even safer. I would recommend trying vaping over HNB to smokers looking to quit. I have only recommended one person in real life to try IQOS as she tried vaping and didn't like it and went back to smoking.
If you vape, stay with that. If you dual use maybe try this instead of any cigs. If you smoke and vape will not work and you have tried many types of mods, tanks, liquids, nic levels and exhausted every option, only then would I recommend this.
I hope that clears up my position.