Automotive batteries use a completely different chemistry and construction, but they can deliver lots of power or explode spectacularly.
Li-Ion cells are far more powerful, but have the disadvantage of being more "fragile". I'm not surprised that they aren't quite as common in electric cars.
Boeing tried them in the new 777 Dreamliner, but problems caused all 777s to be grounded, worldwide, for months. Turns out a couple of wires were crossed, and that the temperature sensors, which couldn't monitor a failure properly, weren't tied to a system to respond appropriately to a failure. The battery wasn't encased properly, and kinda threw off the airport's fire response teams, when they threw water on the problem...
(Shades of bad sci-fi disaster movies. "Atomic Train" was it?)
Actually, far as electrics go (and hybrids), Li-ions are the rule. Word is, Tesla alone is about to consume the world's battery manufacturing capacity as they ramp up.
The industry did have to do a great deal of work on isolating/balancing cells and anticipating thermal runaway but they got a pretty good handle on it and I don't know I'd be any more concerned about a full electric car over gas tanks and lead acid batteries. Maybe even less. Given that, I'd have to wonder about Boeing's, ahem, competence?
Actually, propane and natural gas powered vehicles worry me a tad more. If not the fact that compressed gas is on the touchy side, the fact that LNG importation is about equivalent to shipping armed nuclear warheads around cities (I've seen simulations of an LNG tanker explosion... words fail... it really is up with small nukes).
And this "hydrogen infrastructure" kick? My reply is a Monty Pythonesqe, "You're a loony!"
(Hydrogen is a delivery system, not a power source. We have an electric grid already. Why try replacing the entire thing with a gas that explodes just for the fun of it?)