you are peculiar. just sayin'.....
go play in your "niche" please. or i shall be forced to bite you. buh bye now.
go play in your "niche" please. or i shall be forced to bite you. buh bye now.
Last edited:
you are peculiar. just sayin'.....
go play in your "niche" please. or i shall be forced to bite you. buh bye now.
I think maybe the whole problem here is that we discuss and compare eliquid venders as if they were all in the same class, or category, which they clearly are not - and don't even intend to be.
I don't think, for instance, that ECBlends or mount baker tries to look as upmarket as five pawns, any more than Wendy's or KFC tries to look as upmarket as Alain Ducasse. Why should they? It would defeat their whole purpose.
What I don't understand is this insistence that it's somehow "elitist" to recognize the very obvious fact that all these venders intentionally occupy different niches, and are clearly shooting for different markets.
LOL. That's just what I mean!
In the first place, this just isn't true. Some venders use organic ingredients, some don't. Some extract their own flavorings, some don't. A person can acquire ingredients from a huge variety of sources, or make their own. They couldn't possibly be identical, even if they tried.I'm not sure I would use the word "elitist." "Needlessly arrogant," might be better, or perhaps simply, "Boorishly naive."
There's no doubt that the vendors in question intentionally occupy different price points, but to say that the newborn e-juice market bears any resemblance to the thousand-year-old restaurant industry strikes me as rather presumptuous. There is no obvious difference in the quality of different vendors' e-juice ingredients; the ingredients are dirt cheap across the board. Hell, 90% of the ingredients are flat-out identical. And there is no measurable difference in the quality of the recipes, or in the amount/quality of labor involved to mix them.
I guess there's a measurable difference in the quality of different vendors' packaging, but that kinda speaks to my point here:
The only demonstrable and meaningful difference between expensive juices and cheap ones is their price.
To some, the differences in eliquid are "self-evident." If this wasn't the case, people would all buy from the same place, wouldn't they?That's in stark contrast to your restaurant examples, wherein the vast differences in food quality, labor, skill and attention to detail are self-evident. In each restaurant, the customer has a clear understanding of why he's paying more or less. In the e-juice market, the reasoning behind each vendor's prices is entirely opaque to the consumer.
If a person can genuinely taste a difference between Vender A and Vender B - or prefers glass bottles, for that matter - how on earth is it "pompous" to say so?None of the above is to say that buying a more expensive juice is foolish. Whatever keeps you vaping, and thus keeps you from smoking, is good in my book. And almost all e-juice is cheap in comparison with cigarettes. But to insist that somehow you're a cut above the hoi polloi -- that your taste is more refined -- just because you're paying an extra $10-15 per ounce of e-juice seems gratuitously (nigh desperately) pompous to me.
I'm not trying to bash, and for the record I have not yet ordered from Mt. Baker Vapor. But I am starting to believe that for certain flavors you just have to spend the money. Vanilla being one of them. Many of the reviews on the Mt. Baker website say that their vanillas are not a strong-point for them.
I think maybe the whole problem here is that we discuss and compare eliquid venders as if they were all in the same class, or category, which they clearly are not - and don't even intend to be.
I don't think, for instance, that ECBlends or Mount Baker tries to look as upmarket as Five Pawns, any more than Wendy's or KFC tries to look as upmarket as Alain Ducasse. Why should they? It would defeat their whole purpose.
What I don't understand is this insistence that it's somehow "elitist" to recognize the very obvious fact that all these venders intentionally occupy different niches, and are clearly shooting for different markets.
In the first place, this just isn't true. Some venders use organic ingredients, some don't. Some extract their own flavorings, some don't. A person can acquire ingredients from a huge variety of sources, or make their own. They couldn't possibly be identical, even if they tried.
To some, the differences in eliquid are "self-evident." If this wasn't the case, people would all buy from the same place, wouldn't they?
If a person can genuinely taste a difference between Vender A and Vender B - or prefers glass bottles, for that matter - how on earth is it "pompous" to say so?
Granted, if somebody does claim to be "a cut above" simply because they've spent more money, then sure, that's obnoxious. And I certainly agree that it's possible to be overly precious about vaping in general. What strikes me as odd is the fact that recognizing differences, or admitting to a preference, apparently strikes people as "pompous" the minute cost is involved.
Why is that?
Sociologically speaking, I think this is a very American phenomenon, and probably has something to do with our bizarre relationship to class and money - but that's just me. I tend to think of things like this in sociological terms, and am always amazed at how emotionally charged these subjects become.
Do really think people think this way? What a sad idea!Kelli said:i still maintain that a lot of people get a self-satisfied, superior feeling from purchasing ANY product from a boutique/designer/expensive shop....even if they know they paid too much. i know i have....i just don't like to make a habit of it. but it's fun to pretend to be a "have" instead of a "have not" on occasion.
sometimes, even at the grocery store checkout, i feel i am being judged for my purchases. a lady in front of me may have all high end, brand name items....and will look in disdain at my store brands. truth be known, it's probably the same stuff in different packaging. but it makes her feel good about herself. so yay.
^ I said exactly the opposite, lisancentralix: I said that MBV is trying to look unpretentious and affordable. That's exactly my point. They're not trying to compete with Five Pawns, and are aiming to appeal to a very different demographic.
![]()
In the first place, this just isn't true. Some venders use organic ingredients, some don't. Some extract their own flavorings, some don't. A person can acquire ingredients from a huge variety of sources, or make their own. They couldn't possibly be identical, even if they tried.
To some, the differences in eliquid are "self-evident." If this wasn't the case, people would all buy from the same place, wouldn't they?
Granted, if somebody does claim to be "a cut above" simply because they've spent more money, then sure, that's obnoxious. And I certainly agree that it's possible to be overly precious about vaping in general. What strikes me as odd is the fact that recognizing differences, or admitting to a preference, apparently strikes people as "pompous" the minute cost is involved.
I hope this isn't true but it is definitely a possibility. I am hoping the CLS I ordered will be worth the price.![]()
^ I said exactly the opposite, lisancentralix: I said that MBV is trying to look unpretentious and affordable. That's exactly my point. They're not trying to compete with Five Pawns, and are aiming to appeal to a very different demographic.
Edited to add:
Do really think people think this way? What a sad idea!
And my only issue with your position is the bizarre assumption that if you don't happen to perceive something, then it couldn't possibly exist!Fulgurant said:My only issue with your position is that you assert a clear difference in juice quality based on price, where I perceive no such clear difference.
And my only issue with your position is the bizarre assumption that if you don't happen to perceive something, then it couldn't possibly exist!
I mean, really: How "boorishly naive" and "needlessly arrogant" is that?![]()
i like your post, fulg. i liken the situation to that in the world of coffee. it's all about packaging, promotion, image and marketing. starbucks to me taste terrible, but some people i think feel that they "have" to like it because it's expensive and trendy. ever walked into an upscale coffee shop where a cup cost $4 and up? the haughty pretentiousness practically radiates from the door as you walk in. and yes, maybe i am a reverse snob. guilty as charged. but i have pretty much had it up to here with socially superior people. they all poop and pee just like the rest of us. of course, i'm sure they use designer toilet paper. View attachment 265722
i like your post, fulg. i liken the situation to that in the world of coffee. it's all about packaging, promotion, image and marketing. starbucks to me taste terrible, but some people i think feel that they "have" to like it because it's expensive and trendy. ever walked into an upscale coffee shop where a cup cost $4 and up? the haughty pretentiousness practically radiates from the door as you walk in.