Are you saying that your god has no responsibilities?
He has said that he is (I am). And as a responsible creator he has provided the alternatives. We decide. ...
Healthy people are good/good is balance and health, the incentive is feeling good and well. Unhealthy people create and experience evil/evil is bad health.
Ethics are a far more healthy (good), rational and effective way to teach citizenship and desirable behaviour.
It wasn't us that created evil, it was you apparently and your disordered teachings and stalking are very evil/unhealthy. You're nothing but dissonance, loss of mind and irresponsibility.
Webster defines good as "To any useful end or purpose; serviceable: Wholesome; right; virtuous; sufficient. Bad is defined as "The opposite of good; wicked; immoral; infirm; injurious; imperfect." Christians believe we were created good and made the decision to sin and consequently became bad. God is perfect, defined by Webster as "Finished, complete, consumate; not defective." Can good and bad exist together? Isn't that the paradox? Like two sides of a coin they will always be seperated by a gulf? That is the position mankind finds himself in. We are defective. No good work will qualify according to Christianity. Because bad resides within us. Look at the story of Lazarus and the rich man. Obviously the rich man was good by our standards because he wanted to tell his family of what would befall them. Being "good" is just not good enough. We are all sinners; however the believer is a sinner saved by grace (defined by Webster as "mercy, pecuiliar priviliege") or as Christianity defines grace as God's Riches at Christ's Expense. Does that mean the believer will never sin again? No, because we are still defective and perfected only through Jesus. We can not in any other way "merit" that perfection than believing on one who was perfect to make intercesion for us. That's the forgiveness part we receive as a gift (paid for by Jesus) that is freely offered to humanity. In Jewish tradition; refusing a gift dishonors the giver. Is humanity allowed to do that? Absolutely but the natural consequence exists of being absent from God. As a believer we are still bound by the earthly defective body and sin. We seek God's forgiveness and repent. We try to become more good on a daily basis until we are called home. Can we be assured of our salvation despite being defective? Yes, and such reassurance is a great comfort to the believer. I don't think any other religion offers that kind of assurance. Most seem to require our works or rituals and offer a big "maybe." If we could become good on our own there would be no need for Jesus. Remember we are exploring the heavenly things and trying to describe it in human terms. Do I understand all there is about God? No, I wouldn't be able to believe in a god that I fully understood. That would have been a god of my own creation (fallible and defective). We owe it to ourselves to find the God that is and establish a personal relationship. We have a lifetime to do this afterall.
... Have you ever read "Hind's Feet on High Places?" If not I would suggest you check it out. It's a good short read and very inspirational whether one believes in God or not. Kate I hope you know there is no offense taken on my part and I try not to be offending.
He has said that he is (I am). And as a responsible creator he has provided the alternatives. We decide. We now live in a fallen world for a short time as a result of our choices. The creator forsaw this and from the beginning made arrangements for redemption. I know, I didn't choose this suffering but I choose to believe that this suffering is not wasted. Do I understand it all? No, half the time I'm not sure why I do the things I do. But I refuse to believe that it's all a waste of time. I can't see the big picture. I have a good friend, Scott who suffers from cerebral palsy (sp) and is one of the most positive people I have ever met. Scott has become an ordained minister and has a joy and love for God like almost no one else. Did he choose to have his disease? No. Would he choose to be relieved of his illness? Yes. He believes all things work to the greater good for those in Christ. I find it difficult to argue with him. I think it's probably more cruel to think these things (sufferings) have no purpose.
Hi Kate. I'm intrigued by what you say. Can you give us some sources on the ethics and health? I know you bashed Frankl, do you have anything for us? Which evil God was it that slit your throat?
I am afraid I just get frustrated by it all.....you could talk forever to someone who 'believes' in something that cannot be proved and the conversation just goes around and around in circles. They can keep going on and on about the things that 'prove' their beliefs but when it comes down to it there is absolutely nothing at all that proves anything.
Loads of different religions, with loads of different views .....highly intelligent people in all of them 'believing' they know the answers ....the fact is a jellyfish probably knows just as much as we do about the meaning of it all.