Hah! That's odd. I did another Google search and found this url. Does this one work for you?
http://srs.unm.edu/industrial-hygiene/media/docs/silica.pdf
The BDC (bottom dual coils) are made from traditional cartolike materials, so I don't worry too much about those. All the BVC (bottom vertical coils) have that questionable fiberglass filler--Nautilus, non-Nautilus and Atlantis coils.
Sorry, that's all I know, beck.
This is what I know:
http://srs.unm.edu/industrial-hygien...ocs/silica.pdf
And since we don't even know what kind of fiberglass/ceramic paper they are using...
Again, it's just me. I've been trying to get information about that fiberglass (confirmed by a Swiss-based lab) since September. The company has not exactly been truthful in their responses--to my emails and in public, on their website--about the materials they use in their tanks (it ain't stainless steel, folks) and in their coils. I don't like being lied to. And now they claim that they are using organic Japanese cotton also??? Nobody mentioned that before.
I'll stay with amorphous silica wicks and Japanese organic cotton--at least for now. Silicosis and lung cancer are no fun. The only things we really need in our PVs (necessary risk) are PG, VG, nicotine and some kind of a heating wire (nichrome, kanthal, nickel, stainless steel, titanium). Everything else is just an add-on. I try to avoid add-ons that may pose unnecessary and completely avoidable risks.
Using fiberglass as a wicking material is just plain foolish. There are much better choices out there.
As always, YMMV.
No disrespect intended, Katya, but I don't think you'll ever be satisfied with their explanations, until they provide us with the molecular breakdown of the ceramic material that they use in their wicking material. While I understand why you are concerned, I feel that you may be a little overly concerned about the "what ifs", with a preconceived opinion of the product being harmful, rather than really analyzing the information provided to us in a more scientific manner.
Your biggest concerns seem to be the particle size and the type of ceramic material used, right? I noticed in another reply here that you mentioned the concern of the ceramic particles being smaller than 5 microns. So, just think about that and hear me out for a second.
Material: While ceramics do contain silicates that can cause silicosis, the amount of those silicates is very low in ceramics from what I understand. If you do some research on the subject of respiratory problems with people who work in the pottery industry, you'll find that it is only common in people who work in the field for many years, and who also don't wear respirators while sweeping large amounts of the dust on a daily basis. Getting that level of ceramic dust from a device like this is literally impossible even if you suck on dry BVCs all day, every day.
Particle size: Many people are concerned about the ceramic "grit" that they feel on their fingers when they pull apart a dry BVC. The fact that they can feel the grit pretty much tells us that the particles are larger than 5μm. Mold spores and pollen spores are in the 5μm - 10μm range, and the pollen we see isn't individual pollen spores...it is clumps of them. The human eye can't generally see anything smaller than about 25μm. But, I'm sure people are thinking "But what if the BVCs have ceramic particles smaller than 5μm that we can't see?" Well, the best way to prevent the inhalation of spores and tiny dust particles is to use a wet filter...which is exactly what the BVC provides us with. Even the slightest amount of moisture in the wicking material would prevent the dust from being inhaled. The addition of the organic cotton on both sides of the ceramic wicking material, and the moisture that builds up on the screen mesh that is above the wicking material, are added barriers too. To be honest, I don't think those were even put in place to aid in the filtering of particles, because it really would be unnecessary. If I had to guess, I'd assume that the organic cotton was added to both sides to prevent the media from crumbling during the wrapping process and the screen mesh was put in place to prevent spit back and/or keep any dry "crumbles" from coming loose before being saturated.
Again, I understand why you're concerned and/or curious about the material. I just feel that you have an already preconceived notion that these are bad and it's going to be nearly impossible for anyone to convince you otherwise.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Simple solution for those worried about it. Rebuild. I know exactly whats in my plume veil. Lol.
The "Panicle" of their efforts? OK, SOMEONE needs better English!
Welp, being the antsy person I am, and not having any japanese cotton. I went ahead and rebuilt the spare head that came with my tank with standard 100% organic cotton. Needless to say, it is vaping great!
Now then, I did notice something when taking apart the unused head. There are 2 separate sheets of stuff wrapping the coil. The outside layer looks like the stuff you all are worried about, but the material under it just looks like cotton. Have any of you taken a stock head apart and seen this as well?
EDIT: The inner part of the material touching the coil seems to be the material that is questionable. The material wrapped around it looks to me to be just cotton
EDIT 2: Just took pictures to better explain what I am talking about.. Will link them as soon as I can
EDIT 3: Getting ready to post the images. They might be large, But that is to show detail
EDIT 4: Please click images to enlarge. Hopefully you all should be able to see what I am talking about
View attachment 398493View attachment 398494
The first photo is of what it looks like when you take the whole thing off
The second photo shows, that under the questionable material, it looks to just be cotton.
Could we just take unused heads, and remove the questionable material and put the cotton back on? or is all of it made up of the questionable material?
The "Panicle" of their efforts? OK, SOMEONE needs better English!
Missing the point johnny. The issue we are concerned about is giving the scientific community fuel to use against us.
All we need is for unsafe products to be out there so that the FDA can say "SEE, we told you so".
Caveat emptor, but think this through. I wouldn't buy an atomizer made out of lead, because I know how lead works. Not everyone does, so they can't make an informed decision and assume someone wouldn't sell something if it wasn't safe.
With respect, I think this is understandable yet short-sighted. You're essentially advocating silence about/for potential bad actors to avoid potentially damaging a public image, or to avoid giving ammunition to those looking for it.
This is extremely dangerous, as you can quickly end up somewhere you never consciously intended. It's the same mindset that led to the catholic church covering up abuse, penn state ignoring a predator to protect their football legacy, not releasing torture memos, general motors ignoring a simple switch they know kills people, the mcrib, etc.
And yes, there are people out there who will terrible things because they don't process the human equations as we do. Not long ago someone made the decision to put melamine into baby formula to raise its' protein content, killing some babies and sickening hundreds of thousands. Babies, dude. Think about how differently someone is thinking from you for that to happen.
I lean hard against regulation (super against taxes on eliquid, just for public health reasons), but it won't be people attempting to protect their fellow vapers that cause it. The bad actors are the ones responsible for this stuff, and deserve your ire for endangering a good thing with their short-sightedness.
They are essentially predators -- and silence is enabling to a predator, not helpful to the group.
As for what I am vaping at with the cotton rebuild. I am any where between 23.5 and 26 watts. No dry hits yet ( but I dont chain vape ) I also primed the head before I put it in the tank
Ahhh...but the real question is this. Do you know the chemical composition of, and do you have certificates of purity for every material you build with? Are you 100% positive that your cotton or rayon has absolutely no contaminants in it? Can anyone prove that organic cotton has absolutely no silicates, metal particles, or traces lubricants in it left over from the machinery that harvests and processes it?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Caveat emptor, but think this through. I wouldn't buy an atomizer made out of lead, because I know how lead works. Not everyone does, so they can't make an informed decision and assume someone wouldn't sell something if it wasn't safe.
With respect, I think this is understandable yet short-sighted. You're essentially advocating silence about/for potential bad actors to avoid potentially damaging a public image, or to avoid giving ammunition to those looking for it.
This is extremely dangerous, as you can quickly end up somewhere you never consciously intended. It's the same mindset that led to the catholic church covering up abuse, penn state ignoring a predator to protect their football legacy, not releasing torture memos, general motors ignoring a simple switch they know kills people, the mcrib, etc.
And yes, there are people out there who will terrible things because they don't process the human equations as we do. Not long ago someone made the decision to put melamine into baby formula to raise its' protein content, killing some babies and sickening hundreds of thousands. Babies, dude. Think about how differently someone is thinking from you for that to happen.
I lean hard against regulation (super against taxes on eliquid, just for public health reasons), but it won't be people attempting to protect their fellow vapers that cause it. The bad actors are the ones responsible for this stuff, and deserve your ire for endangering a good thing with their short-sightedness.
They are essentially predators -- and silence is enabling to a predator, not helpful to the group.
Or pesticides? can't forget the pesticides...
Also, on a side not, my dog for whatever reason WON'T eat popcorn...She'll eat peas, corn, broccoli and most stuff kids hate but won't touch popcorn. Anyone figure out why? I speculate it has to do with diethyl. Something my grandpa taught me as a kid "If deer don't eat certain berries then there is a good reason behind this. It's poisonous" I feel it's the same with my dog and popcorn
Material: While ceramics do contain silicates that can cause silicosis, the amount of those silicates is very low in ceramics from what I understand. If you do some research on the subject of respiratory problems with people who work in the pottery industry, you'll find that it is only common in people who work in the field for many years, and who also don't wear respirators while sweeping large amounts of the dust on a daily basis. Getting that level of ceramic dust