The last comment I'll make, and let you all go about your way, is that the problem in all of this is that there was no thought or mention of anyone who doesn't make a choice either way. In the parable about the "tares" and the "wheat," there is a distinction that the people have made a concious choice of one or the other. This does not address anyone who does not make a choice. So, while interpretations can lead one to believe whatever he or she wishes to, the specific issue of those who do not believe in any of it is not addressed.
So, an atheist, by definition, is not a Satan worshiper, or otherwise owned or ruled by Satan. In order to worship something, you must believe in it and embrace it. In order to be owned by or ruled by something, one must carry out acts and deeds as commanded by the ruler/owner. One cannot say that not believing in something, means that you belive in its antithesis.
In the end, I do not think of atheists as children of Satan, because if they were, they would not be atheists, they would be Satan worshipers. I know way too many atheists who carry out deeds that are positive and helpful, love others, and put others before themselves, to put them in a category of "evil." Thanks for the input, though!
So, an atheist, by definition, is not a Satan worshiper, or otherwise owned or ruled by Satan. In order to worship something, you must believe in it and embrace it. In order to be owned by or ruled by something, one must carry out acts and deeds as commanded by the ruler/owner. One cannot say that not believing in something, means that you belive in its antithesis.
In the end, I do not think of atheists as children of Satan, because if they were, they would not be atheists, they would be Satan worshipers. I know way too many atheists who carry out deeds that are positive and helpful, love others, and put others before themselves, to put them in a category of "evil." Thanks for the input, though!