Would a product that had a success rate of 2% after 20 months and was 3 times more likely to cause a major health risk be considered "safe and effective" by the FDA or should they say that "NRT is not a sale alternative to smoking".
Would a product that had a success rate of 2% after 20 months and was 3 times more likely to cause a major health risk be considered "safe and effective" by the FDA or should they say that "NRT is not a sale alternative to smoking".
My letter was published! And I am in excellent company, as the one above mine is from Dr. Murray Laugesen, whose research I keep citing for product safety. It's about halfway down the page.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.