do we need the E-Cig?
1. Initially, the E-Cig replaced the cigarette, and was made to look and act as much like one as possible.
Soon, people realized that wasn't necessary or even desirable.
Now, vaping is distancing itself, and most new E-Cigs try NOT to look like a cigarette/cigar. It did not take long for peoples automatic associations to change, and accept the penstyle as the thing to reach for when they needed a 'smoke'.
2. NRT has tried various methods without success (for most) because it has focused on 'nicotine', but it's delivery methods have been varied, with equal 'unsuccess'.
3. now 'we' know that nicotine is not necessarily the answer, or at least not all of it, and Star Scientific has picked up that ball and is running with in focusing on anabantine.
4. we are attempting to use a similar approach, focusing on B-Carbolines and a WTA approach.
5. our troubles come into play, by attempting to make a suitable 'vaping' liquid, to support # 1. above.
6. WTA is easy, if we use other methods than heated "vaping". (Snus, etc.)
This thread is about E-liquid though, and I believe the advantage that inhalation has is the cause/effect gratification and better self titration due to the near instant onset. (this actually makes it much safer too)
7. there are other advantages to 'cleaning up' our extractions, such as reduction of TSNA's. I've read reports about commercial E-Liquids having these same contaminants too.
8. my point? I don't know... just rambling thoughts.
We have the WTA already, but not vapable with present vaping tech. New tech that accomplishes the same goal of near instant gratification, and accurate titration. Maybe something as simple as a bottle of alkaline water, sip away at it.... 200 ml of water to deliver 2-4 mg of WTA might just be all we need, no vapor, no batteries, no glowing LED's.
Wish I was half as eloquent as Kinabaloo, but I hope I managed to get my point across.