Isn't it customery in these cases for the dollar amount of injuries/damages to be set by the jury (plaintiff can ask, via complaint or in court, but jury decides)? This is not rhetorical; I ask because I don't know.
I'm Not a Lawyer.
But I know that Damages that are Awarded to a Plaintiff in a successful Law Suit are Broken Down into Two Categories.
Compensatory Damages
and
Punitive Damages.
Compensatory Damages are meant to go to the Plaintiff as a Direct Remedy to things like Loss Monies, Lost Wages, Pain and Suffering, Potential Loss of Future Wages, Medical Bills, Lawyers/Court Fees, etc.
These are Asked for by the Plaintiff when the Suit are Brought. I believe that the Ruling Judge has Ability to Reduce these Amounts if he feels that the Suit does Not Provide enough Evidence that the Actual Losses were incurred.
Punitive Damages are awarded not as Compensation for Loss. But as a to Punish the Person/Entity that the Suit was brought against, or Similar People/Entities, from doing what they Originally did again. I believe that the Damages Amount is governed Guidelines but I am Unsure exactly which.
I believe that Punitive Damages are Solely set by the Ruling Judge.
You may ask for $100,000,000 in Compensatory Damages. But I'm Not Sure if a Jury has the Power to Reduce or Uphold such Awards. I think that Power Lies with the Judge. But I could be Wrong.
I also know that Some States, Like California, have enacted some measure of Tort Reform. And have put Caps on Just How Much a Plaintiff can be awarded for Pain & suffering for Medical Malpractice ($250K).
I don't know if there are Any Limits to what someone can Seek in Compensatory Damages in a Lawsuit like this One. Or if there are Any in California.