No I don't think losing millions of dollars per day is, or it didn't seem to be much pressure. Rotating strikes were costing them, but locking everything down had to be costing them more.
It’s even more silly if you do the math. The union wanted 1% more than was offered, so let’s take a worker who makes $25/hour. That is a 25 cent/hour raise, works out to $550. 48,000 workers X $550 = $26.4 million. If the strike was costing as claimed hundreds of millions that was a rather poor business decision on the part of management. Cost the company 100 million to save $26.4 million?
Or maybe their sob story about how much the company lost wasn’t the truth. Liars or just plain stupid, your guess is as good as mine, but neither paints a good picture of management.
Management in this case has no direct financial interest. They don't own shares or options. Pin the loss on the Union, nothing out of their pocket and they don't look bad. The government stood to lose the money, so that was more pressure to introduce the legislation. Win win for management. Next year with the lower wage Canada Post can make even a larger profit than last, so it is pat yourself on the back and bonus time for management.
Cluster-fudge all the way around, I agree.
In the end it is a win for management, draw for government (since it seems workers don't even support workers), loss for postal workers, and a loss, any way you look at it, for us. It doesn't put a smile on my face.