If you look it up Talbot is clearly anti-smoking, anti-tobacco and has already done a great deal of research work in this area especially as it relates to mother and fetus. This is fine and is extremely useful and necessary work. However, when it comes to new technology vesus established opinion/bias then there is a problem, especially when it comes to research. There needs to be research done by "unbiased" researchers if possible and there needs to be some perspective given to the reader, i.e. -what other possible toxicants were tested, other than nicotine and "smoke"; eg. perfume, hairspray, cosmetics, room deodorizers, cleansers, other FDA approved medications-especially NRT's, in additon to medications such as Chantix and others. What about steam from coffee or the boiling of certain food products, pesticides, not to mention the myriad of FDA approved OTC pills, patches, balms, lotions, potions, creams, sprays, inhalants, lozenges, stick-on strips, etc. One Problem, as I see it is this: anyone, who has devoted their life and career to 'being against/opposed' to something is never, ever, going to admit nor disclose anything they find that could ever possibly be construed as a positive concerning the very thing they oppose.
