the SI CE3 is a bottom feeder. I think they are more resistant to the problem juices than their CE2 long wick top feeder. ask imagine on the SI "ask imagine" thread.
"clearomizer" round up for 808s...
- Thread starter Cyrus Vap
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
the SI CE3 is a bottom feeder. I think they are more resistant to the problem juices than their CE2 long wick top feeder. ask imagine on the SI "ask imagine" thread.
The SI bottom coils coming is similar to the kanger T0, which is is the bottom coil version of the t2. I haven't gotten my mitts on it yet. I'd bet they are cone threaded only just like the t2 so they are able to be used on 808s with cone threads. Imagine said the SI version will have 808 threads as well as cone threads, which makes sense. They want people to be able to use it on all their batteries, not just the x2.
Located here is a picture associalted with SI's new bottom coil carto...
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...e-bottom-coil-clearomizers-coming-9-12-a.html
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...e-bottom-coil-clearomizers-coming-9-12-a.html
Well, SI is putting out 2 new bottom coils. One similar to the t2 and one similar to the ce3. The ce3 like one was just put out and doesn't require a syringe to fill.
SI is a vendor not a manufacturer. Kanger is making the new bottom coil T2 and I'm not sure about the larger CE3, but it looks like BetterLifeTech style.
If one vendor sells a item, you can bet most will be also.
If one vendor sells a item, you can bet most will be also.
Imagine/SI says that these will be proprietary to them. Don't flame me, I'm just passing along the info that they are saying no one else will have the new nano's.
Dac311, I'm not flaming, it's all good. I've just heard many vendors say "proprietary" in the past.
Which in their eyes, may mean that they are the first, but many ppl interpret it as the 'only' reseller.
Then a week later the items are on every vendors site and under many different names.
It's the old smoke&mirrors game vendors like to play to keep their minions coming back, at least that's how I see it.
I laugh when vendors say this new item is better than sliced bread, then a month later, they're singing 'There was issues with the last item and we worked closely with the manufacturer and now 'this' new item is better than sliced bread."
Gotta keep those payroll checks rolling.
Thanks for the information and the update Dac311
Which in their eyes, may mean that they are the first, but many ppl interpret it as the 'only' reseller.
Then a week later the items are on every vendors site and under many different names.
It's the old smoke&mirrors game vendors like to play to keep their minions coming back, at least that's how I see it.
I laugh when vendors say this new item is better than sliced bread, then a month later, they're singing 'There was issues with the last item and we worked closely with the manufacturer and now 'this' new item is better than sliced bread."
Gotta keep those payroll checks rolling.
Thanks for the information and the update Dac311
Well I think what SI has going for them is that they are the only people interested in supplying this type of hardware to the 808 people. So it's less likely someone else will come in and sweep the rug out from under them.
fat bat 808 hardware has been out for awhile. They just wised up and decided to try and keep customers before they started looking around and found other vendors with "better" stuff. (note the objectivity of the quotation marks, please) But they are reacting to the market. Not creating it. The only thing they have done is have the current manufacturers change them to suit their batteries because they do offer them a decent market share.
But usually the products have been out for awhile in some form or another and have proven themselves somewhat worthy before SI takes them and makes them their own. That's a good thing though. I don't know how some of those vendors who talk big and deliver garbage stay in business.
But usually the products have been out for awhile in some form or another and have proven themselves somewhat worthy before SI takes them and makes them their own. That's a good thing though. I don't know how some of those vendors who talk big and deliver garbage stay in business.
...not a 'clearomizer,' but perhaps some good news for a few 808 users.
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/clouds-vapor/334745-neat-new-gadget-cov.html
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/clouds-vapor/334745-neat-new-gadget-cov.html
Just got some of those CE3s from SI.
Really nice. Only loaded one up so far but not leaky, super nice vapor/flavor and being able to see your usage is great.
I would love something that held 1ml and that was skinned (with maybe a window) but these will do rather nicely.
Anyone know of something that works this well in a 1ml size? If not, I may just load up on a few more packs of these.
Really nice. Only loaded one up so far but not leaky, super nice vapor/flavor and being able to see your usage is great.
I would love something that held 1ml and that was skinned (with maybe a window) but these will do rather nicely.
Anyone know of something that works this well in a 1ml size? If not, I may just load up on a few more packs of these.
Healthcabin now have Vision clearos for 808: http://www.healthcabin.net/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1076_1134&products_id=8148
Looks like the CE3 is about what I'm looking for. The funny thing is there is a CE2 that is exactly what I'm looking for ( 1ml capacity in some colors) but I don't think performance is nearly as good as the CE3. It looks as though they don't make a 1ml CE3 and just decided to offer a 1.8 ml (which was the CE2 XL). So they made the XL the standard size CE3.
No big deal really. I'm sure something new will be coming out to make the ce3 look crappy soon, anyway. lol
No big deal really. I'm sure something new will be coming out to make the ce3 look crappy soon, anyway. lol
Spoke too soon on those CE3s.
Two worked great. 2 leaked like a sive. Set them up identical. Didn't get to the 5th. But so far 50% is a pretty crappy percentage.
Two worked great. 2 leaked like a sive. Set them up identical. Didn't get to the 5th. But so far 50% is a pretty crappy percentage.
From what I'm gathering, there seems to be some well-established tinkering that improves the glitches with these things. Anyone able to point me to the defacto how-to?
Thanks much. Hoping I can overcome the initial speedbump as the performance on these are great when they work as designed.
Thanks all.
Thanks much. Hoping I can overcome the initial speedbump as the performance on these are great when they work as designed.
Thanks all.
Has anyone tried the smarter 808 budomizers? Looks like an interesting concept.
BetterLifeTech's CE3's have the best flavor of any clearo to date.
I made a post in the clearomizer section about how to obtain maximum performance and I will try to link to it later.
To many bloodymary's atm and the www isn't cooperating with me...lol
I made a post in the clearomizer section about how to obtain maximum performance and I will try to link to it later.
To many bloodymary's atm and the www isn't cooperating with me...lol
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
