Credit Card Company Refused To Process Transaction

Status
Not open for further replies.

ms277017

Full Member
Verified Member
Dec 6, 2012
44
53
Tyler, Texas
Just saying again: any organization that can make tomatoes utterly and completely disappear guys..........

Yes, that is right the fruit. It went completely away, from the entire surface area of the USA, in less than 24 hours as if a tomato facet was turned to the off position.

"Hold the tomatoes," "sorry sir, tomatoes are banned right now anyways and we do not have any so don't worry."

I went to my fave Mexican restaurant:

"We have chips, but no salsa............,"

"Then what good are the chips?"

"You can still order queso sir, but there will no tomatoes in it; is that kay wit joo??"

"This must be the damned twilight zone...."

This alone basically taught me a major lesson about this fading republic: anything can go poof at any time they choose....

Self-reliance scares the hell out of them, it is such a blessing in my mind so many people are going full mech and learning how to coil a basic atty and even those who haven't may know someone who does.

That is what leads me to think it wont happen because they know probable by now most people can keep going irregardless of a ban IMO

This hobby is the king of DIY hobbies lmao

The parts are so basic it is sickening too, that along with some effort w/these calls to action etc. it's pretty hard to stop a train ;)
 
Last edited:

yzer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Nov 23, 2011
5,248
3,870
Northern California
Beware of errors in logic.

FDA makes tomatoes scarce for a while.
FDA can make corn scarce, too.
Therefore, FDA will make corn scarce.


Vendor "A" provides incorrect information to merchant bank "B".
Merchant bank "B" refuses to process CC orders for Vendor "A" based on the bad information.
Therefore, all merchant banks will refuse to process CC orders for all vendors based on the bad information Bank "B" got from Vendor "A".

Video "A" on YouTube is true.
Therefore, all videos on YouTube are true.
 

Night Owl

Full Member
Verified Member
Aug 15, 2013
29
22
Fort Lauderdale FL
  • Deleted by retired1
  • Reason: Unregistered supplier business discussions are not allowed on ECF
It seems certain states may have passed their own laws, which came into effect Jan.1, 2014, to supplement the 2010 PACT Act which prevents online sales of 'tobacco' related products, including cigarettes and roll your own tobacco, but excludes cigars for some reason. Apparently, the banks don't want to get civil penalties relating to processing online tobacco sales to persons under 18 since online vendors can't absolutely verify the age of the person buying the products. I haven't researched the state specific laws, but it may be that they are deeming vaping/e-cigs as tobacco related products. Which they aren't and it doesn't make sense, since it seems the original legislative intent of the PACT Act would be to prevent vendors from selling to children and prevent children from buying tobacco online, since tobacco causes cancer, contains over 4000 dangerous chemicals, and has hundreds of health related issues it contributes to, of course. But e-cigs can contain nicotine or have zero nicotine & have not been found to cause any health problems so far. So, the law as it is written is to prevent sales of tobacco, not nicotine specifically. I would think that the banks have have the right to deny any transaction they deem to be in violation of the law, but lumping vaping supplies into the PACT Act without it being specifically listed in the law is ridiculous at this point. I see this as a major problem to the vaping community in the future, as more states will act to curb online sales, and the bank will follow their lead for sure.
 

Berylanna

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
2,043
3,287
south Bay Area, California
www.facebook.com
Apparently, the banks don't want to get civil penalties relating to processing online tobacco sales to persons under 18 since online vendors can't absolutely verify the age of the person buying the products. I haven't researched the state specific laws, but it may be that they are deeming vaping/e-cigs as tobacco related products. Which they aren't and it doesn't make sense, since it seems the original legislative intent of the PACT Act would be to prevent vendors from selling to children and prevent children from buying tobacco online, since tobacco causes cancer, contains over 4000 dangerous chemicals, and has hundreds of health related issues it contributes to, of course. But e-cigs can contain nicotine or have zero nicotine & have not been found to cause any health problems so far. So, the law as it is written is to prevent sales of tobacco, not nicotine specifically. I would think that the banks have have the right to deny any transaction they deem to be in violation of the law, but lumping vaping supplies into the PACT Act without it being specifically listed in the law is ridiculous at this point. I see this as a major problem to the vaping community in the future, as more states will act to curb online sales, and the bank will follow their lead for sure.

The claim is the opposite, that some (but not all) ecig vendors have used a tobacco commerce code instead of a grocery or gadget or health supplement or whatever code, so an intermediate credit card processing company used by many but not all banks started bouncing those in some states as of that date. The cure is for the vendor to NOT register with credit card companies as a tobacco outlet. I don't remember the exact code #, I think it's #5993 or something like that, that needs to be avoided. It's earlier on this thread and the closed thread.
 

Jarbs

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 16, 2013
749
773
New Jersey
The claim is the opposite, that some (but not all) ecig vendors have used a tobacco commerce code instead of a grocery or gadget or health supplement or whatever code, so an intermediate credit card processing company used by many but not all banks started bouncing those in some states as of that date. The cure is for the vendor to NOT register with credit card companies as a tobacco outlet. I don't remember the exact code #, I think it's #5993 or something like that, that needs to be avoided. It's earlier on this thread and the closed thread.
well, this just makes a whole heck of a lot of sense.
 

Uma

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 4, 2010
5,991
9,998
Calif
The Act cannot be amended without an act of Congress and there has been none. I want to know, for now and the future, when a bank can legally freeze my funds unless I'm present, in person, to swipe my card (as stated by the Bank of Oklahoma) and cannot order vape gear "on the net, by mail or on the phone" as they posted. I live in Arizona where that's pretty much the situation as soon as the FDA deems ecigs tobacco but what the banks and processors have done here should be a wake up call to everyone else who thinks they're okay because their State allows net sales. Its all gonna change as soon as the FDA has their way and, now, everyone should see how they're going to be and join CASAA now!
Tyrell, on the show, Buzzsaw, was just discussing how wrong Congress(?) has been of late, holding all those closed door sessions that are supposed to be open to us, the taxpayers, to audit.
Here it is
alert to the sensitives, he gets a little passionately expletive now & then. He's not bad, like me for instance, but Mother Margaret would faint.
It's the episode with the dairy cows photo
TheLip.tv | Let's talk about it.
 
Last edited:

Keeferes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 21, 2013
794
664
Belton; Upstate SC
www.facebook.com
Multiple orders 1/7/14

I ordered things from Amazon, eBay, and three separate vape vendors. No trouble at all. Used a visa branded debit card from sun trust bank in SC. The items I ordered included a mod, coil building supplies, batteries, a mini torch, and juices.

It's not that hard to control the purchases to ensure minors can't buy. It would be up to the vendors to verify age before filling orders. This can be done when the account is setup. I deal with suppliers for tattoo equipment, that you must send verification documents (ie. apprenticeship certifications, copy of drivers license to prove age, and the CC/DC being used must match the shop name or verified customer name registered when account is created) to the vendors before you may order from them. This is kind of a big headache on the vendor side, and slows down the initial purchase of the consumer, but once verified all is good.
 
Last edited:

WeVap31980

New Member
Mar 13, 2014
1
0
Chicago
These credit card companies are always a pain. We had the same issues and lost our account. After searching google forever we found this company and they were outstanding. Got our account approved right away and have been processing since. I found out too late that there are not many companies who work in our industry, but am really happy I found this company Payline Data out of Chicago IL. payline data dot com
 
Wow, that really sux. I'm so sorry that your bank did that to you. I don't know who you bank with but I use Bank Of Americ.....and have never had that issue. I don't think that is legal for your bank to do that as these products are not illegal. They have no right to stop you from using your money. Is this a debit credit card? If so, you need to take this seriously and take a stand for yourself. Speak to the bank manager and let him know you will be blasting there company and speaking with your attorney if they don't allow you to use your own money! You are not doing anything illegal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread