Cyclone RBA Nirvana

Status
Not open for further replies.

turbocad6

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jan 17, 2011
3,318
16,450
brooklyn ny
also hey ukeman, as I said in pm I didn't measure my cut and have no way to measure after the fact but here is a good shot of it, basically it needs to be just shy of flush with the top of the 510 threads, again this isn't a very critical dimension and close to this would be close enough, idea is when the o ring is compressed the atty will sit flush to the reo body and this will allow any larger atty's to sit flush to the reo. this will allow you to use almost any dripping atty modified for bottom feed

 

turbocad6

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jan 17, 2011
3,318
16,450
brooklyn ny
everything I have now fits it, but if it ain't bottom feed then what good is it on a reo :)

just about anything should fit now, I mean it would look stupid with a 22mm atty on there but within reason you could now use almost anything. want to build an immortalizer with quad coils as a bottom feed?, this would make that doable. nimbus and cyclone and trident and whatever else, now the well is no longer a limiting factor, now it's just a matter of converting an atty to accept a bottom feed
 

ukeman

PV Masher
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 22, 2010
7,718
5,129
Kauai, Hawaii
everything I have now fits it, but if it ain't bottom feed then what good is it on a reo :)

just about anything should fit now, I mean it would look stupid with a 22mm atty on there but within reason you could now use almost anything. want to build an immortalizer with quad coils as a bottom feed?, this would make that doable. nimbus and cyclone and trident and whatever else, now the well is no longer a limiting factor, now it's just a matter of converting an atty to accept a bottom feed

ohyeah… da uhhh… lol. thanks Turbo! bottom feeding is the best!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread