Hi Zoidman, I think these are important points.
I was kinda staying away from the good faith/bad faith arguments because there's really no objective way to look at this.
However, it's this "informed decision" bit that concerns me. What is an "informed decision" when the science is so poor that individuals essentially have to guess what the effects of DA/AP are?
We, having these discussions, are pretty "plugged in" to the issue. But what of a 70 year old smoker who's buying some
e-liquid and never ventures into the online or offline cultural community. What are they to make of "contains x% of diacetyl", for example?