dripbox
- Thread starter gertan72
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
No Flippin clue. With a minimum of .2 ohms I doubt it's temp control only.
I hate how they put out teaser crap like this... what I'm guessing is that it fires a steady voltage like 3.7 volts and depending on the Ohms of your build you could get up to 60 watts. That's not necessarily a bad thing, it's simple and if it has buck and boost so the vape is consistent through battery life start to finish I could be happy with that.
If it's a glorified smokeless owl squonker I'm all set.
So I asked a question on breazy.com (one of the sites with a preorder) this was the answer...
Q: Is it 510 threaded or is the connection proprietary?
03/04/16
A: Yes it is a 510 connection. But keep in mind if you use a different atomizer beside the one it brings, You will not be able to use the built in dripping feature.
Sort of answered that it has a 510 but didn't clarify that other bf attys might work...
Q: Is it 510 threaded or is the connection proprietary?
03/04/16
A: Yes it is a 510 connection. But keep in mind if you use a different atomizer beside the one it brings, You will not be able to use the built in dripping feature.
Sort of answered that it has a 510 but didn't clarify that other bf attys might work...
This answer would tell me whomever answered the question clearly has no insight to BF'g and assumed you would be putting a standard atty on the device... Maybe the question should've been, Can I use another BF atty on this device? Just thinking out loud here...
For what its worth, KT verified on FB that it is in deed a 510 connection...
Exactly, we have to realize who or what we are dealing with here. All this bottom fed stuff we do around here is plain old vodoo to the typical vape crowd. I won't be passing any judgement on this or the specs until we get closer to the expected release date, I am sure there will be revisions all over the place until then. Either way I see it as a positive sign to all who squonk or want to squonk.
Unless it's some super deluxe new liquid feed design, I would assume it's probably a fixed pin 510 feed.
I actually LIKE the atty.
It SAYS "replaceable" and they clearly will sell that screw-in deck - but it sure looks rebuildable.
I actually like the looks of it - the two posts and high air slots...
I EXPECTED to hear that the bottom part was permanently attached - if not, and that's 510 connected, then I probably want one.
Still curious - only says "maximum power" and "minimum resistance" - but there's nothing but a fire button - so it seems it's a mechanical squonker, just with a resistance limit. I'm OK with that, too, actually - but most people are calling this a regulated squonker - I don't think it is.
It SAYS "replaceable" and they clearly will sell that screw-in deck - but it sure looks rebuildable.
I actually like the looks of it - the two posts and high air slots...
I EXPECTED to hear that the bottom part was permanently attached - if not, and that's 510 connected, then I probably want one.
Still curious - only says "maximum power" and "minimum resistance" - but there's nothing but a fire button - so it seems it's a mechanical squonker, just with a resistance limit. I'm OK with that, too, actually - but most people are calling this a regulated squonker - I don't think it is.
I am calculating 68.45 watts
3.7v/0.2ohm = 18.5A
18.5A X 3.7V = 68.45W
possible interest if either mechanical or regulated. Anything else I will let others test it out first!
3.7v/0.2ohm = 18.5A
18.5A X 3.7V = 68.45W
possible interest if either mechanical or regulated. Anything else I will let others test it out first!
Its a hollow 510. Most likely the ss feed tube is part of the atty itself and not the 510. If this is indeed the case you probably are stuck with the atty
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Those heads are the biggest questionmark as well as the atty connection.
If it's a "regular 510-bf" meaning one could use other bf-atties me likes, but if it's something special aka you won't be using different atties AND those heads aren't rba's I think I'd rather get couple of Smokless Owls.
If it's a "regular 510-bf" meaning one could use other bf-atties me likes, but if it's something special aka you won't be using different atties AND those heads aren't rba's I think I'd rather get couple of Smokless Owls.
So you've actually seen the 510? Any pics you can link? So you think they put something like a FDV 510 in it?
Kanger Dripbox Mod Kit $35.92 | Vaping Cheap says "However, if you do like building your own coils, the removable deck system will make it much easier since you can build your deck outside the atomizer base."
I can tell by the last few pics this will not sell to the masses like everyone thinks... Pretty much a fail IMO because it looks like you will need to use the proprietary atty with it. Would really like to see a pic down inside the 510 of the device...
One shop posted in the description that you could use your own BF atty. But who knows if they know?
And I still wonder whether it will sell to the masses with no settings buttons and display.
For ME the atty is more important. At least it's rebuildable, even better if replaceable.
And I still wonder whether it will sell to the masses with no settings buttons and display.
For ME the atty is more important. At least it's rebuildable, even better if replaceable.
This is the sentence I should've posted....."For the ejuice system to work you will need to use the Subdrip RDA or a squonk ready RDA with the Dripmod so that ejuice can pass through the 510 connection."
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
