Nice find! I've made several comments.
It seems like the media is finally telling both sides of the story - I think we can thank the WSJ for that!
When are they going to invent the e-comment, somehow I need to break this addiction. I just got finished reading through ALL the comments on the original MSN article and posted quite a few. This is very time consuming and I am not nearly as prolific as some (hint, hint,,, you know who I'm talking about.
Anyway, the last comment made me think-
Well I tried the E cigarette and about 3 months after smoking it, had a lung exray and my lungs were full of fluid. It was not pneumonia. I quite the E cigarette, had a follow up xray a month later and my lungs were clear. My concern is if I had not had the xray which was part of an exam prior to surgery, (my surgery had to be postponed) what would have happened after 6 months, a year or longer. After all, there is nothing that says what causes the vapor, it is a fluid and it is filling our lungs. I feel very fortunate that I found out before it was too late. So YES, FDA should control the "E" cigarette, not only yes, but find out more about what is in it!!!!!
Reply#134 - Thu Sep 2, 2010 11:18 AM EDT
Anyone ever hear any comments about this type thing?
**** After posting, I sent an email off to the gal and asked a few questions. If I get a response, I'll give you her perspective. ********
Ummmm ... something is definitely off with this one. If her lungs were full of fluid, she would have been so short of breath she would have been in the hospital. The fact that she is saying it was only found because of a pre-op x-ray just does not ring true in my experience as a nurse. Even a small amount of fluid in the lungs will give you symptoms so if they were full she wouldn't have only found out because of a pre-op x-ray.
Thanks, MoonRose - I think you should post a response to her comment (be sure to hit reply right on HER post) and say EXACTLY what you said here, including that you are a nurse!Ummmm ... something is definitely off with this one. If her lungs were full of fluid, she would have been so short of breath she would have been in the hospital. The fact that she is saying it was only found because of a pre-op x-ray just does not ring true in my experience as a nurse. Even a small amount of fluid in the lungs will give you symptoms so if they were full she wouldn't have only found out because of a pre-op x-ray.
Now let's not get too aggressive, she got back to me, sounds sincere and said she'd check out ECF.Thanks, MoonRose - I think you should post a response to her comment (be sure to hit reply right on HER post) and say EXACTLY what you said here, including that you are a nurse!
Go get 'em, Tiger!
Now let's not get too aggressive, she got back to me, sounds sincere and said she'd check out ECF.
She said she loved them, it enabled her to give up smoking. She tied the fluid to use of a PV because the fluid disappeared after not using them for a month.
She said she used the E cig all the time but one cartridge would last a couple of days, sometime longer so it appears she wasn't either a heavy smoker or vapor.
It admitted it may be a co-incidence, but didn't believe that. She's back on cigarettes, but says she is cutting back, but we've all been there.
I hope she shows up her and maybe work through what might have happened.
She said she used the E cig all the time but one cartridge would last a couple of days, sometime longer so it appears she wasn't either a heavy smoker or vapor.
Thanks, MoonRose - I think you should post a response to her comment (be sure to hit reply right on HER post) and say EXACTLY what you said here, including that you are a nurse!
Go get 'em, Tiger!