All over the world there are people saying bad things about E-Cigarettes. I believe that when you label something with a name that name sticks out above all other things.
For example, if I handed you a fruit you never had before and didn't know what it was, but it looked sort of like an apple.. I tell you it's a new type of apple, you taste it and it's good, almost exactly like an apple. But when you're talking about it, you think of it as an apple, not a replacement for an apple.
I believe the labeling of our PV's needs to be that, PV. I believe calling them E-Cigarettes is going to end up getting us in to more situations where government is trying to ban them as unregulated cigarettes, these are NOT cigarettes, and we need to get that reference out of there.
Alternative to smoking, yes, absolutely! I know what I'm saying here seems a bit off the deep end, but I don't believe it is.
I'd like to hear your thoughts on this, should we not take action and get the "cigarette" part out of everything to do with PV's, or what is your argument for keeping it there?
Please don't come back with something about smokers not knowing what it is if they're not called E-Cigarettes, it's up to US to educate people, not a product naming scheme!
Me and my wife were in Wal-Mart the other night and I started talking to a lady that was buying cigarettes about my PV, gave her my email address to get more information, THIS is what should be done for getting the word out and ending cigarettes.
It is my belief that the "E-Cigarette" branding is going to hurt our efforts, not help them.
Sorry for the rant, this has been bothering me lately.
Thanks,
-TTI
For example, if I handed you a fruit you never had before and didn't know what it was, but it looked sort of like an apple.. I tell you it's a new type of apple, you taste it and it's good, almost exactly like an apple. But when you're talking about it, you think of it as an apple, not a replacement for an apple.
I believe the labeling of our PV's needs to be that, PV. I believe calling them E-Cigarettes is going to end up getting us in to more situations where government is trying to ban them as unregulated cigarettes, these are NOT cigarettes, and we need to get that reference out of there.
Alternative to smoking, yes, absolutely! I know what I'm saying here seems a bit off the deep end, but I don't believe it is.
I'd like to hear your thoughts on this, should we not take action and get the "cigarette" part out of everything to do with PV's, or what is your argument for keeping it there?
Please don't come back with something about smokers not knowing what it is if they're not called E-Cigarettes, it's up to US to educate people, not a product naming scheme!
Me and my wife were in Wal-Mart the other night and I started talking to a lady that was buying cigarettes about my PV, gave her my email address to get more information, THIS is what should be done for getting the word out and ending cigarettes.
It is my belief that the "E-Cigarette" branding is going to hurt our efforts, not help them.
Sorry for the rant, this has been bothering me lately.
Thanks,
-TTI