One more question about the DNA75 before I (try to) stop derailing this thread, I keep reading the 133/200 is more efficient/accurate then the 75 but I don't understand in which way. Is it about the temp reading, battery consumption or something else?
"Mod efficiency".
This gets tough for me... in a quick attempt at my own education, I couldn't find a straight definitive answer.
What I went in thinking...
In part... it has to do with how a mod handles the voltage supplied by the battery.
Unlike a mech mod where "what you got is, well... what you get", a regulated mod can alter that voltage to smoothly provide the wattage requested.
If that calculated voltage is
lower than the current charge state of the battery(s)... the mod uses a "buck" circuit to reduce it (a feature oddly lacking on the IPV D2

). Easy enough.
In the other direction... the mod uses a "boost" feature (using capacitance and higher amp draw) to provide a required voltage
above the charge state of the battery(s).
Energy is extremely malleable. It can be transformed from AC to DC and back again, trade offs can be made between voltage and amperage to step it up or down, etc. But each induces a loss as well as the pure inherent loss of additional circuitry.
The DNA 200 chip set does not have a "boost" circuit.
It was designed to use a 3-cell (3S) LiPo pack and in essence the supplied voltage will never drop below 9 or so volts. Does this account for the 200's efficiency? Dunno.
Then the other possibility...
Just being an electrical circuit there will be losses due to materials and resistance.
Add in the electronic aspect... well, now you're just giving me a headache.
Okey doke... I can see where good vs. poor circuit design can affect efficiency.
But which is it? Or is it both? Something else?
(One writer used the term to describe power delivery
accuracy. That's different.)
It seems our budget mods run around the 70/75/80% mark (that seems low).
The new DNA 75 (buck & boost because single cell) is published at 85%.
The DNA 200 has a staggering claimed 97%.
Beyond the "why it is"... I'm curious about the "how it's done".
Sorry... I have more questions and fewer answers than you do.
