Wow Ok I've read a zillion posts of people saying OMG it's so tiny, seen many pics and vids, just got mine and wow didn't expect it to be this tiny! Got here just in time too, my hana modz clone stopped firing today
Wow Ok I've read a zillion posts of people saying OMG it's so tiny, seen many pics and vids, just got mine and wow didn't expect it to be this tiny! Got here just in time too, my Hana modz clone stopped firing today
I use mostly ego threaded toppers and have the adapter that came with them on both of mine. No problems.
The iStick's battery life, overall power output and, most of all, its size, is what makes the device brilliant enough that we've put up with all of its baggage. The iStick's price is also very attractive. Most vapers do not want to walk around with a dual 26650 box mod capable of firing 150w.
I just received my second iStick from Central Vapors' Black Friday sale. $21, shipped. They threw in a USB cable and liquid sample for the extra wait. After the early demise of my first, it's great to have a working iStick in my hand again. It's a device you love to hate (or is it hate to love). In any case, treat the iStick gently and protect the 510 threads and it can be your goto vape for a while. I think I'll be disassembling my new 'Stick and reinforcing some with hot glue or epoxy...
What bothers me about this picture is that nobody seems to know the circumstances of how it got that nasty in a week. What flavor juice was being vaped? What PG/VG ratio? And, most importantly, how many watts were pushed through it? I just looked down into my 1.6 Ohm coil, that has been running for a week at 8W, and has had few different juices run through it (Mr E's Blue Voodoo 67/33, The Collection Sapphire 40/60, and my own Banana Creme 50/50). I vape around 5ml/day and the center of my cool looks clean with a very thin light brown coating. This is the best picture I could get, but you can see the top of the coil wire, and it looks like that all the way down the inside of it. Getting light down that bvc that, at an angle that my camera could see, was nearly impossible. I'll pull this coil apart next week and will get better pictures then.
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yea tiny really means tiny .... now you need to order the mini and see how tiny that is
Ok, soy coil hit the 2 week mark, and here it is in all it's glory.
The wick wrapped coil out of the sleeve. I looked for the grid I've read about and there was no sign of it on the wet wick.
Just to summarize...this is 2 weeks of use of a 1.8 Ohm (I incorrectly said it was 1.6 earlier) with around 5-7ml/day run at 8 watts on a regulated wattage PV. I know this is off topic for this thread, but we were discussing it, so I figured it's the place I should post it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now--that would be helpful --in case the issue pops up with someone else.

A much easier solution than the bending adapter is using a eGo-510 adapter and a beauty ring. Simply screw in the adapter and beauty ring, attach your topper just until it makes contact and unscrew the beauty ring until it's tight against the topper. No wobbles, loose toppers, threads protected. The beauty ring acts as a lock-nut, a common accepted engineering practice.
It adds about 3/4 inch to the height, but I can still fit two isticks in my shirt pocket that used to only hold one pack of smokes.
Is that the 510- ego adapter?
The black stuff you see on the cool isn't "cooked" stuff. It's fluffy and soft, and it appears to be just wicking material saturated with the various colors from the different juices I used. Some of that is probably due to the reaction nicotine has when heated, too.
Just to show that it isn't hard cooked on crap, I rinsed the cool under tap water (without rubbing the cool) and you can see how clean it came out in this picture.
thanks, that should be helpful to all bvc users!
any chance of rinsing the wicking material to see if it's really just juice particles?
that used to be our favorite exercise in the 'burning carto thread![]()
Great pictures, thanks Charlie.
The coil doesn't look bad at all. What I would be concerned about is the fact that what you found isn't baked on stuff, like we would normally see on a gunked up coil covered with unvaporized particulate from your juice flavoring, coloring, sweetener and such. That kind of cooked-on juice gunk is normal and usually stays solidly attached to the heating coil and can be removed by dry burning only.
However, loose fiberglass particles (assuming that this material indeed is fiberglass as stated in the lab report) floating freely in the tank have been my main concern wrt BVCs from day one. I have been told by many users that that can't happen because that material only crumbles (disintegrates, falls apart, whatever) when the said material is dry; once wet, it stays intact and there is no chance of any fiberglass particles getting into the juice, my mouth or my lungs. Your observations, if correct, seem to prove otherwise.
Again, this is just my opinion. I may be dead wrong, and those coils may be perfectly safe to use. I simply don't know enough. Aspire pulled all the information from their website and there has been no official statement on the subject since. Except from a strange statement, made in passing by the presenter in this video, that the material in Atlantis coils is cotton.Really? Since when? Every reviewer who took the Atlantis coils apart confirms that they are made out of the same material as BVC coils. So why would this guy say that it's Japanese cotton???? Another lie from Aspire? Another mistake? Translation error? Or are they planning to move away from the fiberglass to Japanese cotton stealthily in the future?
4:29 min.
Silica is generally considered to be potentially harmful when very small particles are inhaled deep into the lungs, where the macrophages are unable to remove the fragments which then become lodged in the alveolar lung tissue, causing miliary nodulation (classic silicosis) and scarring/fibrotic changes in both lungs.
Amorphous Silica: Multiple studies have found amorphous silica to be biologically inert when ingested and inhaled, with the exception of extruded fiberglass and ceramic fibers (which have been designated as carcinogens by the National Toxicology Program), which are hazardous due to their very small size and their high length to width aspect ratio. Because of this inertness, the US Food and Drug Administration permits the use of amorphous silica (not fiberglass or ceramic fibers!) in food and medicine.
This is what I know:
http://srs.unm.edu/industrial-hygiene/media/docs/silica.pdf
And since we don't even know what kind of fiberglass/ceramic paper they are using...
Again, it's just me.
I know that others disagree. I'll stay with amorphous silica wicks and Japanese organic cotton--at least for now.