We can still keep the software the same imeo. I am used to pressing the ggts button fast now 
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
We can still keep the software the same imeo. I am used to pressing the ggts button fast now
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
if we keep the 2. option, there is no reason to push quick the justGG button aal. The justGG button will be used only for vaping and the button on electronic module will be used for the rest of functions
if we keep the 2. option, there is no reason to push quick the justGG button aal. The justGG button will be used only for vaping and the button on electronic module will be used for the rest of functions
I'd also vote for Option 2. Would it be possible to make a plain tube and operate from inside? I guess I would prefer "Classic" GGTS/JGG Style without additional buttons or LEDs on the outside. Once the personal preference is found I usually don't change the setup anyways. Of course the electroni part button need to be accessible in an easy way.
Stupid question:
is there any way to option 3?
(i.e.: the GG button used also for settings, as Crown chip does)
option 3 cant be made because electronic is not made like this Otello. I could make it like this but it would be a very cheap construction and it would also depend on mods's button and I didnt want to have problems because of these buttons
I think the problem is how to have the positive of the electronic part reach the positive of atomizer if button is at the bottom.
How you can archive clouds of vapor?
By putting Penelope V2/3 onto JustGG/GGTS with a 30amp 18650......lol ......![]()
Would it be possible to make a ring with outside threads that hold the electronics and can be screwed into the GGTS/JGG Engraved Tube so that the JGG button makes the contact? The LED might be visible through JGG venting holes, not so sure about GGTS venting holes...![]()