They are, here's a couple of quotes...Could be they're not using TC. It works fine in power mode and especially well on mechs. On mechs it gives a nice "preheat-like" boost when cool.
I have some good luck using Temco 316L SS but it does drop in res and rise in res temp factor once broke in. With a new build when the vape begins to go anemic I let it sit at room temp for an hour, unscrew the atty, hit the fire button to clear the res and then screw the atty back on and re-read the res. It only takes .01 ohms drop in res to make an anemic vape. .01 ohms drop equates to approx 85°f cooler vape with 316L so re-reading the base/cold res is necessary when using SS (especially 316 and 317). With chinesium SS all bets are off as the TCR/RTF can be all over the place due to lack of quality control/assurance issues. 430 SS rocks for TC as does Ti and NiFe52 alloy. Those three have high res and high TCR/RTF values; both attributes being desirable for more accurate TC.
Hope this helps Kiba.
"In my opinion as well as several others 316 is far superior"
"Curious as I have seen several people on ECF talking, for some time now, about this recent 430 grade being better than 317L or at least more so for people with nickel allergies.
Not sure how that will pan out for vaping on TC but it seems to be very highly thought of.
Time will tell."
"Why are they raving about it? Because they are idiot vapers that have done zero research"
tbh after using this crap for a weekend I can't imagine why anyone would prefer it over 430...
I don't think the screws are an issue tbh, even if they were non-conductive, they just clamp the wore to the post.... and my resistance is in the correct range.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Last edited:

