I have a new home in mind for it, I don't trust the place to return it, I'll just give it to a friend of mine for Christmas (last Christmas actually)don't rightly know how to mark that post![]()
really aggravating though that you can't discuss in here what's all over the news ......... sighi have read plenty on the subject - i was objecting to willy's post claiming the wapo was misleading their readers. as far as i can see that's not so - the headline i saw tied the vaping 'offshoot' to deaths and lung damages.
i have read plenty on the subject - i was objecting to willy's post claiming the wapo was misleading their readers. as far as i can see that's not so - the headline i saw tied the vaping 'offshoot' to deaths and lung damages.
Reading just that title, what will the majority of non vaping folks think?
Strangely enough I received the two 20700 cells from the problem place, they were addressed to my order number, I thought at first it was something my son had ordered. The package had a tracking number that I didn't receive and they were mailed 2 days ago.My order has been fulfilled and I have a tracking number. I guess I'm getting a new mod.
never mind the url - what was the actual headline of the article? i can't follow - all out of free articlesgoogle news definitely shows ''......... vaping products'' in headline
![]()
i've been known to do thatTry deleting your Washington Post cookies, that has worked for me when I exceed a set number of articles.
(the early case cited by NBC)
apparently, plenty of peopleWho, with even a modicum of common sense, would vape vaseline (the early case cited by NBC), olive oil, canola oil, vitamin E oil or any other oil?
Generally, I think that the overwhelming majority of commercial liquids are pretty safe and don't contain oils, at the very least. Even the few that may have some component of oil in them it is a fractional amount, not the total base carrier. It's not in the interest of a manufacturer to make their customers sick or kill them.
Now it's going further. I just watched a news report, with a medical doctor, Marc Seigle, who made it a point to mention that the current crop of problems seem to be related to ... oils. But, there's always a but, he went on to talk about the "very high levels" of nicotine in Juul as an example. He conveniently neglected to mention that the absorbtion rate of nicotine from vaping is considerably lower than the absorption rate when smoking.
The problem is superficial examination of numbers without examining the full data. That is very similar to the early tests that "conclusively" showed extremely high levels of aldehydes in vapor. They never mentioned that they were running all their tests at maximum power levels or even dry burning the atomizers and producing vapor that no one could vape, even with iron lungs.
Newton Minnow was right, back in the '60s, when he said TV is a vast wasteland and now it's also made the MSM a vast wasteland.