Yuppers, that be the one.
It would have made a nice DNA250C
that seems reasonable enough - much better than mainstream articles:
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...Eu4YQVwpm55jNVvQIzioIRM-Z8v3G6QoOuu3zu_JYKwC0
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...Eu4YQVwpm55jNVvQIzioIRM-Z8v3G6QoOuu3zu_JYKwC0
you know, that's really ridiculous! somebody should take a look at ecf policies and get them out of the stone age. t h c is not a dirty word
The link is back to working. Someone, somewhere, woke up, finally.
I can understand not wanting ECF being a "hit" with Google for wacky weed, but in this case, especially, THC is a critical part of the problem to all appearances. (Let's see if that gets censored)
I can understand not wanting ECF being a "hit" with Google for wacky weed, but in this case, especially, THC is a critical part of the problem to all appearances. (Let's see if that gets censored)
Periodically all rules should be examined in terms of current needs and societal trends. Some rules would stay and some may go but to remain stuck at the day of the founding (with the exception of the proper name "Dick" thanks @classwife) strikes me as either obstinate or lazy.
i always rated that as classy's most notorious achievement for the benefit of the community
joking aside, for some time now ecf appears to have been rudderless
Similar threads
- Locked
