i'm sorry, i thought this was a discussion. i won't doubt anything you say anymore and bow down to e-cig king like everybody else. long live bill GODshall!
Sore loser.
i'm sorry, i thought this was a discussion. i won't doubt anything you say anymore and bow down to e-cig king like everybody else. long live bill GODshall!
If everyone who has negatively speculated about the future of e-cigarettes joined forces with CASAA, NVC, Smokefree Pennsylvania and tobacco harm reduction advocates (to hold the FDA accountable for promulgating sound regulations, to oppose e-cigarette taxes, to oppose e-cigarette sales and usage bans, and to educate the public), we'll continue winning most (and maybe all) battles and e-cigarette sales will continue to skyrocket, which will give us even more clout in the public policy process.
In my reading about the FDAs regulatory powers, it seems that the FDA can regulate both the nicotine containing parts of a device, but also any other part of the device used to consume tobacco. Meaning a regulation of e-cigs, batteries, atomizers, etc... much as they may regulate rolling papers, filters, etc... and any item in a kit to make cigarettes.
Does this mean they can require vendors to submit a sample and supporting evidence of every kind of change made to an e-cig? The expense of these regulations could be quite prohibitive, and also mean that PG, VG, flavoring, etc.. could be regulated as a tobacco product. My brief reading of the FDA guidelines make it seem that submissions of tobacco products for marketing are anything but trivial.
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM239021.pdf
i'm sorry, i thought this was a discussion. i won't doubt anything you say anymore and bow down to e-cig king like everybody else. long live bill GODshall!
I cant believe how much negativity is in this thread. I think I'm gonna have to stop checking it. Bye bye thread. You people just keep looking your gift horses in the mouth and don't read anything that myself of Bill have said.
I cant believe how much negativity is in this thread. I think I'm gonna have to stop checking it. Bye bye thread. You people just keep looking your gift horses in the mouth and don't read anything that myself of Bill have said.
In my reading about the FDAs regulatory powers, it seems that the FDA can regulate both the nicotine containing parts of a device, but also any other part of the device used to consume tobacco. Meaning a regulation of e-cigs, batteries, atomizers, etc... much as they may regulate rolling papers, filters, etc... and any item in a kit to make cigarettes.
Does this mean they can require vendors to submit a sample and supporting evidence of every kind of change made to an e-cig? The expense of these regulations could be quite prohibitive, and also mean that PG, VG, flavoring, etc.. could be regulated as a tobacco product. My brief reading of the FDA guidelines make it seem that submissions of tobacco products for marketing are anything but trivial.
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM239021.pdf
But the SKY IS FALLING !!!!! Finch
oh maybe it was the sun setting ??
We always have at least a few 'sky is falling' types Secti0n. At least this time they're congregating here for the most part rather than spreading doom and gloom all over the forum. The last one that springs to mind informed us all that we were nuts if we thought that the FDA would ever give up and regulate e-cigs as a tobacco product.![]()
I cant believe how much negativity is in this thread. I think I'm gonna have to stop checking it. Bye bye thread. You people just keep looking your gift horses in the mouth and don't read anything that myself of Bill have said.
It could also mean that the days of vaping in places where smoking is currently banned are over. State's have been forced to allow vaping in bars and other places where smoking was banned because most states couldn't make the case that ecigs are tobacco products - now the precedent is set that they are.
Overall, more bad news with this ruling than good.
JL Canada BANNED THEM ! , also Taxes are NOT levied by the FDA sorry , but do some research first un informed fear mongering is not very useful .
I know there is a conspiracy.
The issue regarding clean indoor air laws is not how a product is categorized. Snuff and chaw are tobacco products but are not covered in smoking bans. The issue is smoke, and if someone tries to turn the issue into "The FDA says they're tobacco products" it will be our job to jump all over their case about it.
Vapor is not smoke. We need to start posting that statement everywhere. Everywhere. If I had the money for billboards, I'd plaster that 4-word slogan all over the country.
As for the "overall more bad news remark..." you must be new around here. Had the FDA won the case, their storm troopers would be breeaking down doors all over the country right now to confiscate the "unapproved drug-delivery devices" from store shelves and suppliers' places of business.