If the IQOS heat-not-burn product is subject to the Master Settlement Agreement payments then may be we know the motivation for the flavor bans. IQOS is already FDA approved, ready to go, and I presume coming very soon to a C Store near you..
But of greater concern was that the polymer filter melted slightly during use and released formaldehyde cyanohydrin, a toxic substance which could be fatal to humans. The compound is metabolised in the liver and broken down into formaldehyde and cyanide.
If it doesn't work, why has it captured 10% of the cigarette market in Japan?Anyway. I doubt anything will pave the way for IQOS. Few months ago saw it display and gave it a try. Horrible!
If it really works PM would have gave away the device for free/cheap and made loads on selling the HEATS refills. But they know it doesn't work so they are selling the device for close to $200. They know very few will continue buying refills.
My memory is what wound up actually happening though is it all went to “anti smoking” media buys that were actually used to spread pro BT antivaping messages.Actually, the tobacco settlement money is supposed to go towards tobacco illnesses, research, tobacco related medical healthcare, cessations, etc.. etc.. This would actually mean that Vaping is entitled to some of that tobacco settlement money, because vaping is an effective treatment.
Why shouldn't it, with a name like PM and it's marketing machine behind it. !0% buying it doesn't mean all will continue using it. Nicotine containing eliquid was illegal in Japan as soon as 2017. That helps also.If it doesn't work, why has it captured 10% of the cigarette market in Japan?
tasted worse than a cigarette to me. No TH, wispy smoke and no nicotine hit. I can't describe it as close to smoking.Horrible? Compared to a tasty vape, yeah, it tastes like crap, pretty much just like smoking.
I actually tried it in the duty free. As far as I remember they have two models. The big size one (higher mah) was close to $200I'm not sure where you're getting that $200 number from. Is it possible that includes some crazy tax imposed by your government? The going rate for the device in most markets where it's currently being offered is half that or less.
Totally agree. One more option for risk reduction. It is better than smoking anyway. First time I tried a heat not burn device was 6 years ago. bought a cheap one at fasttech for $15. Didn't like it and it was kept in storage since then. When I tried IQOS it was exactly the same experience and taste.FWIW, I have one that I bought on a whim in Europe last year. I don't use it much, but I do see it having potential for harm reduction among people who've not been able to transition to vaping, either due to missing the taste of smoke, or due to fact that nicotine alone isn't a full-function substitute for tobacco smoke.
Who is the Biggest Winner Out of the Vaping Ban and JUUL Debacle?
https://www.ccn.com/biggest-winner-vaping-ban-juul-debacle/
Lavery noted that the controversy around JUUL and the FDA’s criticism towards the e-cigs company could lead iQOS to benefit, an electronic cigarette sold by Philip Morris that enables users to smoke traditional cigarettes.
Who is the Biggest Winner Out of the Vaping Ban and JUUL Debacle?
https://www.ccn.com/biggest-winner-vaping-ban-juul-debacle/
Lavery noted that the controversy around JUUL and the FDA’s criticism towards the e-cigs company could lead iQOS to benefit, an electronic cigarette sold by Philip Morris that enables users to smoke traditional cigarettes.
If the IQOS heat-not-burn product is subject to the Master Settlement Agreement payments then may be we know the motivation for the flavor bans. IQOS is already FDA approved, ready to go, and I presume coming very soon to a C Store near you..
.
A complex, expensive process
The problem for e-cig makers is that the application is not a simple two-page document. Philip Morris' application is said to have been over 1 million pages long and cost millions of dollars to produce. Small manufacturers simply won't have the financial resources to comply with the complex rules to keep their products from being pulled from the market.
I'm sure heat not burn will sell but I have no interest. I have what I want.Why shouldn't it, with a name like PM and it's marketing machine behind it. !0% buying it doesn't mean all will continue using it. Nicotine containing eliquid was illegal in Japan as soon as 2017. That helps also.
tasted worse than a cigarette to me. No TH, wispy smoke and no nicotine hit. I can't describe it as close to smoking.
I actually tried it in the duty free. As far as I remember they have two models. The big size one (higher mah) was close to $200
Totally agree. One more option for risk reduction. It is better than smoking anyway. First time I tried a heat not burn device was 6 years ago. bought a cheap one at fasttech for $15. Didn't like it and it was kept in storage since then. When I tried IQOS it was exactly the same experience and taste.
A year or two back Dr had an opinion. He said IQOS is 90% less risky than cigs compared to 1% less risk for vaping. Something I learned recently, once you start the vaporization process you have to keep puffinng until it done or it's wasted, like a cigarette. Also, I expect to cost as much or more than smoking and the government won't remove it from the market no matter how manyy kids use it.Yep - I noted too via a thread I created that IQOS already has FDA approval to be sold as a tobacco product. Their PMTA approval also showed how expensive and time consuming the process actually is.
From this article:
Here's Why IQOS Could Completely Own the U.S. E-Cig Market | The Motley Fool
Plus it took nearly 2 years for approval.
What concerns me, is how much of a health risk the IQOS system really is:
iQOS may not be as harm-free as claimed, study finds