Fox News Saftey Concerns for E-Cigs

Status
Not open for further replies.

BigBaddBossyDogg

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 28, 2009
106
1
Wow!

I mean just Wow! It really amazes me how the otherwise intelligent folks on this forum who are concerned about the future of e-cigs can degrade this discussion down to bashing the news network that segment aired on for ideological reasons that have NOTHING to do with e-cigs.

Seriously folks this thread should be about debunking the misrepresentation of e-cigs on the media. Its no place ideological slant from eith side of the isle. If news bashing is all you want to accomplish take it the DNC or RNC websites forums.

This is a place for e-smokers as a community not for a specific political party or ideological stance.

J-
Amazing, isn't it.

Not to mention Fox News has more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined.

Back to the doctor. He recommends Chantix, a drug known to cause suicidal thoughts and tendencies. OK, then, whatever.

And for Pete's sake, stop needlessly worrying about the kiddos. They can eat a cigarette just as easily as an e-cig cartridge.

GOVERNMENT: Get the hell out of my life!
 

EtherMagic

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jul 14, 2009
223
59
43
This same Vid was already posted on these forums 4-5 months ago, I remember when this aired, it was sometime at the beginning of July maybe even end of June.

Old news my friend...

BTW thanks for adding for those who have not seen this, but I'm sure the media will have a much different approach/perspective and opinion on E-cigs if researched now. Many studies supporting e-cigs came out between now and when this actually aired.


Paul



:)
 
Last edited:

ddy611

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 7, 2009
254
0
Chicago, IL USA
so real cig is better:lol:. is all about the money:nah:. the government is not making money from this and thats why its bad. heck, nicotine patches are worst than this. i tried nicotine patches before and i was feeling light-headed and jittery:cry:. the only difference from ecig and nicotine patches/nicotine gums is that the govenrment is making money from it:evil:. just like drugs are bad but prescription drugs are good because they make money. you do know if you want your drug to pass FDA, you have to pay off the government, its helps:sneaky: speeds up the process. and some if this so-called prescription drugs are worst than crack. and no im not a druggie, i swear:nun:.
 

EtherMagic

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jul 14, 2009
223
59
43
so real cig is better:lol:. is all about the money:nah:. the government is not making money from this and thats why its bad. heck, nicotine patches are worst than this. i tried nicotine patches before and i was feeling light-headed and jittery:cry:. the only difference from ecig and nicotine patches/nicotine gums is that the govenrment is making money from it:evil:. just like drugs are bad but prescription drugs are good because they make money. you do know if you want your drug to pass FDA, you have to pay off the government, its helps:sneaky: speeds up the process. and some if this so-called prescription drugs are worst than crack. and no im not a druggie, i swear:nun:.


Umm, did you read my post??? This FOX NEWS vidoe happened over 4-5 months ago, most likey at the end of June.

This Vid was already posted on this forums long long time ago, it's old news, nothing to worry about or even talk about!


Paul
 
Farce News is the $3 toothless ...... of Corporate News Network whores. They've already made up their minds and they'll beat the facts to conform to their "truth". Whatever Murdoch and the other Masters Of The Universe say, goes.

Just look at what Fox News did to those two journalists who exposed bovine growth hormone in milk. Monsanto exercised their pimp hand and got Faux News to pressure these two reporters to lie about artificial BGH.

"After a five-week trial in 2000, a jury decided unanimously that Akre was fired solely because she threatened to blow the whistle to the FCC the broadcast of a false, distorted or slanted news report. The panel that found in Akre's favor awarded nothing to Wilson who represented himself at trial.

The Fox appeal was largely on an argument that it is not technically illegal for a broadcaster to deliberately distort the news on television. The appellate justices reasoned that since state law provides whistleblower protection only for employees who object to misconduct which is against an "adopted law, rule, or regulation" and they decided prohibitions against news distortion are merely a "policy" of the FCC, the reporters' eight-year-old lawsuit must have been without merit from its
inception."


The Price of Whistleblowing - The Fox News Corporation & rBGH

Don't expect any fair coverage from network news and their puppet masters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread