What are the characteristics that define Genesis-Style?
A rebuildable deck that sits atop a tank with a hole just large enough for a piece of Stainless steel mesh to pass through which you would wrap your coil around. characteristics that define Genesis style atomizers for me personally are: Dry hits, acrid flavor from stainless steel mesh, frustration.
Many people swear by Genesis designs, I swear I'll never own one again. the inherent flaw in the design is that your juice is below your coil and to get from the tank to the coil, it has to fight gravity. some people report success by using some method of getting cotton wick in there, others don't mind walking around taking a toot with their vaporizer inverted like they're drinking from a beer bottle.
I think there are far better designs out there these days.
What are the characteristics that define Genesis-Style?
^ either bought a super ....ty atty or doesn't know how to build gennys or both. You can get dry hits on any atomizer, regardless of design or style. Perfecting the atomizer's ability to wick has nothing to do with the mod maker/style and everything to do with the person building/wicking.
I personally believe gennys have the most pure, unaltered flavor. I use RDAs like my Atomic, Trident and Nimbus all the time. I always end up going back to my gennys though. I get sick of my RDAs and I think this has to do with, and this is completely my own theory, the fact that along with vapor you inhale from vaporized liquid you are also inhaling liquid itself that is unvaporized.
It's not hard, it just takes som practice. Some gennies are easier to set up that others. One major factor is distance from wick to center post. Too long of a distance, and there will be too much of a span (read: coil wire that is not cooled by liquid or the mesh itself). This spanned wire will heat up more than the coil itself, and cause nasty flavor.
Recapping replies so far...coil around a wick atop a deck above a tank...wick penetrating deck.
What about air..? Is a side hole in the top cap of a genny a defining factor, or is a atomizer with air coming up a center tube a genny as well?
If you were to give a list of pros and cons when reviewing atomizer designs, this would be the biggest con. The learning curve is just to much of a barrier to overcome. I fiddled and fiddled with my genesis type for probably two weeks and never could either get a good vape or a consistent build from one coil to the next. Then I get my hands on a Kayfun and a Russian and suddenly I'm a God when it comes to making coils. The design itself might not be flawed, I'll grant you, but it shouldn't be that hard to get a good vape, and in deed it isn't as I've come to realize as I've used my Russian and been more than happy with it's performance.
Two engineers come up with two independently different designs for something that does the same thing. Which is the better product, the design that a novice can master with ease or the design that requires hours of instruction and practice to master? I go with the former!
i have to say V A did a bang up job on the kraken what a bad a** little atty.thick clouds and gooey rich flavor.There are varying degrees of difficulty in setting up various gennies. I started with an Aga T2. It was a PITA, and can still be. Other atties can be a lot easier. I've read a lot of "got it on second try" stories about the RSST, for instance. I don't own one of those, but I can say that the Kraken and the Ikarus is a whole lot easier to set up than the Aga. Again... for me. YMMV.
Not to argue, just to share a different perspective: I find it less annoying, messy and tissue paper intensive to set up my Kraken than my KFL. I also much prefer the flavor of the Kraken. Probably because I'm no big fan of either silica, cotton or ekowool. My vote for better product? Very much personal preference: I pick the one with pyrex tank. The one that gives (me) the better flavor. The one that can be refilled without removing it from a mod and without carrying a screwdriver. That doesn't require me to guesstimate my liquid levels. The one I don't have to change wick in twice every week. That would be the Kraken
If there was a perfect atty, we'd all be using it. Until that comes along, we'll all have to weigh up the pros and cons that matter to us.
If you were to give a list of pros and cons when reviewing atomizer designs, this would be the biggest con. The learning curve is just to much of a barrier to overcome. I fiddled and fiddled with my genesis type for probably two weeks and never could either get a good vape or a consistent build from one coil to the next. Then I get my hands on a Kayfun and a Russian and suddenly I'm a God when it comes to making coils. The design itself might not be flawed, I'll grant you, but it shouldn't be that hard to get a good vape, and in deed it isn't as I've come to realize as I've used my Russian and been more than happy with it's performance.
Two engineers come up with two independently different designs for something that does the same thing. Which is the better product, the design that a novice can master with ease or the design that requires hours of instruction and practice to master? I go with the former!
Good point; I haven't seen any so called rebuildables that pull air up from the center tube instead of the side; I guess on the genesis the center tube is used to bring up the eletricity only.