The battery life and low capacity I can live with, part of the cost of being small.
I have started day 2 of testing out the eRoll.
I am not getting the same performance others have reported using an eRoll, it very well could be the juices I am using.
I am not getting as much vapor as some people report, the taste is muted and I taste plastic.
On day one I was going side by side with a 3.7v cigalike with 1.7ohm carto. I am doing the same thing with a two ohm carto.
The cigalike the 2ohm carto is outperforming the eRoll.
On paper it makes sense that a 3.7 sized cigalike would holds it's own (actually winning). Both are running the same volts, one is using a tank and separate atomizer, the other a cartomizer. I thought from reviews that this atomizer might be having some efficiency over the cartomizer.
I have seen reviews where people say this is blowing away other cigalikes. While it does if you carefully select batteries and cartomizers I am finding the contest very close.
How are you guys getting your vape performance out of these?
I have started day 2 of testing out the eRoll.
I am not getting the same performance others have reported using an eRoll, it very well could be the juices I am using.
I am not getting as much vapor as some people report, the taste is muted and I taste plastic.
On day one I was going side by side with a 3.7v cigalike with 1.7ohm carto. I am doing the same thing with a two ohm carto.
The cigalike the 2ohm carto is outperforming the eRoll.
On paper it makes sense that a 3.7 sized cigalike would holds it's own (actually winning). Both are running the same volts, one is using a tank and separate atomizer, the other a cartomizer. I thought from reviews that this atomizer might be having some efficiency over the cartomizer.
I have seen reviews where people say this is blowing away other cigalikes. While it does if you carefully select batteries and cartomizers I am finding the contest very close.
How are you guys getting your vape performance out of these?
Last edited:
