Has anyone ordered the new smokefree version

Status
Not open for further replies.

paulyc44

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 8, 2009
204
16
A review from an investment message board. Bias maybe but...

"i didnt recieve my SFIO smokeless till yesterday afternoon. im totally impressed. truly the real feel (and by feel i mean craving suppressed) and 100% smokeless. i started drinking early yesterday as that has always made me crave a ciggarette. i honestly gotta say. "they did it" throughout the evening and all day today including the present moment....anytime i had the urge to go burn a grit, i told myself "lets see if this SFIO product is worth a puff" i have taken several hits off the ecig"smokeless" and each time im like wtf? im looking for the smoke exhale as a sort of gratitude or accomplishment . but the craving disapeared, far better than any ecig ive ever tried . whatever is going through my "smokers" mind , was completely fullfilled after taking a few vaporless hits off our new product. and i have yet to smoke a typical Camel light cigarette, like i have for the last 18 years. its really quite crazy for a longterm smoker to comprehend, untill they try it. this is truly an amazing revolutionary product in the making. my honest opinon. i plan on buying another $5 or $10k in SFIO securities tuesday morning cause its just to perfect to pass up the opportunity. good luck to all investors. if you know of someone who smokes, buy the $30 starter kit and give it to them as an early present. youll be saving their life and potenially making them very wealthy, if they decide to invest in SFIO as well :)"
 

paulyc44

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 8, 2009
204
16
Another review...

Well, my first night out with RE/AL was a huge success. We did some blind testing between other ecigs and the RE/AL. Now I know the difference because I supplied all the testing product but my friends who smoke ecigs and regular cigs did not.

First off ....no one knows about this product aside from all the ranting that I have been doing in the last few weeks...That has to change, somehow the public has to be made aware of this great product that does everything it says....

There were about ten of us from all age ranges 25-70.... I figured the blind test was the way to go because smokers really love to see the vapor/smoke and I thought it would sway opinion.

The RE/AL's soft filter was a big hit. 3 of the participants actually thought I was giving them actual cigarettes when they tried RE/AL blindfolded. They kind of knew right away when they tested the ecigs , one with a mouthpiece, and one with a hard plastic filter. I held the products for them so they were not dissuaded by the feel other than their lips.

The thing that stood out most is that everyone agreed that the best nicotine rush came from the RE/AL which is why I urge non-smokers not to try this product. Those of you who have ever experienced or have seen others literally turn green and vomit from a tobacco product know what I am talking about. It happened to me many moons ago when I tried my first pinch of copenhagen snuff. I was really suprised myself when I observed the same sensation from my private test. That little filter definitely packs a kick. 3 or 4 puffs was enough for us to get the effect and put it down. One of my friends decided he was going to go at the whole filter, after he started sweating and proclaiming how his heart was pounding I had to cut him off LOL.

What everything basically came down to in the end was FLAVOR. The regular and menthol Marlboro's scored the worst!!! Preceded by my three piece ecig that has menthol cartridges.
We likened the RE/AL Virginia blend to a clove (sweet)cigarette which was suprising because the website kind of makes it sound like it is a more traditional tobacco flavor whereas the American blend was thought to be closer to but much tastier than traditional tobacco. Unfortunately the "juice" that I use in my mod tastes a lot like waffles so everyone seemed to enjoy that flavor the most.

The one problem I have with the RE/AL is that I think we either burned out the heating element or completely drained the battery in a few hours time. I'm trying to recharge the battery as I am typing now to see if that was the problem. In all honesty it was being used way more than it would be with one person and normal circumstances but the other two ecigs held up just fine. There is no way to tell what the indicator light means. Sometimes it would blink and other times it would come on for a period of time as a steady glow, and that's when I took it away from them. I think that the manual should have some explanation as to what the different cycles of the light mean because all it mentions is flickering which I never witnessed.

All in all I think that the product delivers exactly what it says it does and if you close your eyes the difference is that the RE/AL in our opinion surpasses the effects of the vapor ecigs which is a good thing. Now I only had three cases of filters and we used up two of them last night so now I have to get back in line and wait for more filters!!! (and possibly a new heating element :( ..)

We give a big thumbs up to SFIO for a great little product.... Now I cannot wait to take it out into social situations where smoke or vapor is frowned upon. I know I'll have the last laugh when I see all the smokers huddled in their designated smoking areas like cattle in a corral and I sit there and puff away wherever I want to.

Great job TS and you've got 8 new customers and 3 new investors just from my little test last night. I've got 3 more events to attend this weekend but I'm afraid that I didn't purchase enough filters because I wasn't sure how well it would initially go. Silly me. How was I supposed to know that you were going to knock it out of the park !!!!

I hope the only focus now is to make the general public aware of this brilliant new technology...Hold on to your shares everyone, I think we have a winner..

P.S. It was just the battery and not the heating element. I'm enjoying it again.......and going to get in line for some more filters ! Good luck everyone and on this holiday let's not forget the men and women who fought and gave their lives to secure our freedom !!!
 

Jtoo

Moved On
May 23, 2011
18
0
Illinois
Here's what some other vaper/investor in this so called P&D has to say......And you also have to take into account the fact that it was only the investors who knew about this product ...This was not a highly publicized launch but rather a trial run so we were first in line to get the product......And you can be sure that if I thought this product was a POS I would have sold out and urged others to do the same and came back here and told everyone how awful it was, but that did not happen. Any way read this post from an investor board.........................................................

SFIO- ***** thanks for the invite. I've seen you post on a couple of other stocks that I hold as well and I will be looking forward to further discussion but for now I'm all about SFIO.

Your numbers are correct. When I first ordered the product I originally posted that the RE/AL filters were very expensive when compared to the other ecigs that I own. But now after trying the product out I believe that it is well worth it.

Many people use ecigs for various reasons. I for one started using them with the intention that I wasn't going to quit smoking but I now would have a healthy alternative to satisfy my nicotine cravings. I own a couple of different types of ecigs. One of them cost 60 dollars for a months supply the other just 40. The carton a week habit that I had was costing me just over 200 a month at 50+ per carton so I found myself breathing better and saving a lot of money. a "win, win" for me.

Then came the RE/AL. The delivery method of the RE/AL is very different from any other ecig on the market and much more effective as well. Just a couple of puffs of the RE/AL and you get a nicotine rush that compares to no other, even a regular cigarette. So in my estimation I could use the RE/AL about half as many times or less as I would my ecigs which would make the prices pretty comparable.
And you cannot put a price-tag on this vapor-less technology . You could actually use this product on an airplane!!!

The kicker to all of this is that the handful of investors that stuck around through the .000's were only awaiting this ecig product and we are just finding out now that we were given so much more. SFIO has the European patent on this device already and it is not just an ecig. This is a groundbreaking medical delivery device !! I am just beginning to learn about Nano particles and what they can do and SFIO's product uses this nanobead technology to deliver nicotine but there is a realm of other drugs that these nanobeads can safely and more effectively deliver than just an oral dose.
One only has to google the word "nanobead" to see what I am talking about.

All along this ride we have been on, SFIO always stated that they were working within the guidelines of the FDA. That always seemed strange to some of us as the FDA is the ecig industry's biggest enemy IMO. But could you imagine the possibilities if the FDA were to approve this product as a medical delivery device? That could have been SFIO's intention all along and not many of us saw that only focusing on the ecig. The possibilities seem endless here and SFIO is WORLDWIDE not just the US......

I believe the coming months are going to paint a picture for SFIO that is wayyyyy larger than just some little, yet very effective, ecig.... I for one will be at the edge of my seat and kicking myself for already selling off 1.5 million shares every step of the way. I did very well but I could have done much better !!!

GLTA here, and everyone should take a look at SFIO and the nanobead technology which is already patented in the EU. This is only the beginning IMO
 

Jtoo

Moved On
May 23, 2011
18
0
Illinois
Definitely non-tampon like......
uct[ereal2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Jtoo

Moved On
May 23, 2011
18
0
Illinois
Nope just trying to raise awareness in the Vaper community. I will stop with the stock talk but the nanobeads are for real. That's why a cart with 2mg packs such a punch, it is absorbed immediately by the mucus membrane, not traveling in a cloud to your lungs and then releasing unused portions in the cloud that is exhaled. We all smoke/vape for different reasons. If you smoke to get a nicotine fix then this to me (RE/AL) is the most effective way to receive that dose. If you smoke to make pretty clouds then any mod will do just fine !!!

more research......

From SFIO's filter manufacturer:

Long-lasting experiments with the Nanobead technology have shown that a smokeless cigarette with advantageous characteristics can be produced by filling a nicotine receiving depot with nanobeads in which nicotine and, if required, further flavours are added and then the nicotine depot is inserted into a mouthpiece. The nanobeads transport the added nicotine and flavours on their surface and can then attach and be reabsorbed by the mucous membrane. Together with the inhalator tube, a smokeless cigarette is offered which the consumer can hold in his/her hand or mouth like a traditional cigarette and "smoke" it. Only special nanobeads are used whose physiological properties are harmless and which are approved and can be used as nutritional supplement. The production and the recipe of the nanobead solution with nicotine and flavours is being patented and protected.
 

Jtoo

Moved On
May 23, 2011
18
0
Illinois
OK my last one for today that might describe it a little better for everyone.........

This is an SFIO document from 2009. Some may have seen it. But I had not, and it has some interesting information about REAL.

ABOUT ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES AND TOXIC CHEMICALS
Why Smokefree Innotec believes its Real Smokefree product will prevail.

Whether electronic cigarettes are the most suitable alternative to smoking the
cigarettes that generations have puffed on, is part of an ongoing discussion. On July 22nd and July 23rd, 2009, two major American national daily newspapers,
USA Today and the New York Times, reported about the FDA taking aim at
these electronic or e-cigarettes. They strongly suggested that tests showed that
the currently available e-cigarettes were containing known carcinogens and toxic
chemicals, like diethylene-glycol, an ingredient used in antifreeze, printing ink,
break fluid and glue, and nitrosamine, which is used in rubber products, the
tobacco industry, and -less concentrated- in beer and fish-products.

Nashville , Tennessee based Smokefree Innotec is in the process of launching a
completely different electronic cigarette. When confronted with USA Today's
editorial, Smokefree Innotec C.E.O. Thomas Schroepfer stated that his
company’s cigarette alternative operates different than the e-cigarettes already
on the market and that his, the world’s first completely smokefree ‘hi tec’
cigarette, does not require any kind of transponder substance. "Whereas the
competitors still yield a smoky kinda vapor and a light at the end imitating the fire
in the cigarette", according to Schroepfer: “…inhaling the company’s Real
Smokefree product does exclusively yield nicotine and aroma”.

The most significant distinction between the current e-cigarettes and Smokefree
Innotec’s soon available product is that the ones in the market now are all using
cartridges filled with transponder substances and, in most cases, nicotine for
several smoking sessions, while Smokefree uses a slightly adapted yet
traditional cigarette filter with nicotine interspersed through nanotechnology:
enough to give the same satisfaction as an ordinary cigarette but in a dosage
way lower than in one tobacco-based cigarette.

Marcel Hoffman of AHN Biotechnology, the German supplier of Smokefree
Innotec’s filters commented: “These filters are produced by us in Germany ,
where we have the most rigid standards and we guarantee that in our labs no
carcinogens and toxic chemicals are used or will pollute the production”.
Certificates of all sub-contracted suppliers have been submitted by AHN as
evidence for his statement and are scrutinized by corporate lawyers.

To the opinion of the management of Smokefree Innotec the currently marketed
electronic products carry too high levels of nicotine: according to information
given by the manufacturers of these e-cigarettes some of their cartridges contain
up to sixty times or more than a regular cigarette. Commenting on the nicotine
levels of these electronic cigarettes and of regular cigarettes AHN's Marcel
Hoffman suggests: “The way we use nicotine in Smokefree Innotec’s filters is
most likely four times safer than in a regular single cigarette”.

Smokefree Innotec Directors Thomas Schroepfer and Evert Wilbrink strongly
believe that, because of Smokefree Innotec’s cautious approach, the market will
definitely shift in favor of the Real Smokefree product that the company has been
developing for so long. When their Real Smokefree ‘hi-tec cigarette’ will be
launched next month it is expected to be favorably received since it is geared to
be so much safer than any competing product. Wilbrink says that “Smokers may
need to get used to smoke an alternative that does not release anything that
reminds of smoke at all, but eventually they’ll realize that we all should limit the
amount of chemicals that our bodies are exposed to every day”.

The cigarette has come a long way since first developed in Central America in the 9th century. From the middle of the 19th century onwards commercially
manufactured cigarettes were no longer simple objects, consisting mainly of a
tobacco blend and a wrapper, and over the last decades the focus of the industry
has been on additives to enhance the tobacco and its blend, which now may
contain reconstituted tobacco and many of 599 chemicals already submitted by
the industry to the United States Department of Health and Human Service in
1994 or even more. For the management of Smokefree Innotec, using a regular
filter and no additives whatsoever is an important health issue and a step closer
to the origin of cigarette-smoking.

The Board of Smokefree Innotec believes it to be very positive that national
dailies like USA Today and the New York Times publicly address these issues.
Smoking is arguably the number one health hazard and one may wish that
smokers understand what to do to limit their exposure to carcinogens and toxic
substances. After all smoking was originally intended to be a joy…
 
May 30, 2011
0
0
.... you
  • Deleted by AngusATAT
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread