A masquerade of "science" to make dumb people even dumber, and then to make them preach at me with their dumb "facts", "studies" and "experiments". As if someone who has just realized the e-cig exists, armed with those "facts" they gathered on the news, could possibly have something to teach to someone who has been vaping for almost SIX years, and has been reading PROPER science on the matter for all that time...!
This! More than half of what we post in "media" forum is a masquerade of science, and yet stuff that people we know and like will approach us as if it is now (scientific) fact. I always kinda thought science could be manipulated (on the masses) and therefore subject to corruption. Now, it's kind of hard to doubt it, and constantly makes me wonder whenever I hear the phrase, "a new study finds."
There's no display of scientific method in OP article, no citation of the study. And a whole lot of negative spin about what eCigs are. IOW, nothing new for any of us who've been following this stuff for months/years. Yet, it comes off as if 'science says this.' And for many people that is followed by, "so it must be true/accurate."
It's a lot like the independent, unbiased version of science is dead. I don't fully believe that, but on this issue, it is on vacation. Our side does a study (regardless of the results) and it has seemingly inherent bias. The other side does study and the bias is very obvious to us who pay attention to the game. Vaping, more than any other issue I've experienced, shows science taking sides and coming up with vastly different data. Then organizations like WHO and FDA get to pick which side's data that wish to adopt, and in the process lose a whole bunch of credibility toward practicing actual science. Oh joy.