Then you aren’t paying attention. Many experienced international and new vapers both still use the terms vape pens and oils.
Then you aren’t paying attention. Many experienced international and new vapers both still use the terms vape pens and oils.
Vaping was always headed for regulation. Cloud chasers had nothing to do with that. What the rude cloud chasers did do was get vaping banned in vape friendly establishments that were willing to overlook the regulations.
Yes there are rude mtl vapers too. The vaping militants did not help either. Vaping being classified as a tobacco product didn’t help. Point is vaping was always going to to be regulated because it works and is no single group of vapers responsible for that happening. Those regulations being enforced is another matter.I still think that cloud chasers were a sideline and not a reason.. I think the reason was mass amounts of MTL vapors suddenly vaping in non smoking establishments and practically daring the non smokers to do something about it..
I'm currently vaping a 0.34 ohm SS coil in a DoggyStyle RTA at 15 watts. My juice is 100% PG and if I hold the vape for three seconds it is the ultimate stealth vape in that there is virtually no cloud at all.
![]()
I can PM you the study...we could go back and forth , but one thing is for sure, you cannot disprove what I have saidI've never felt so disappointed by this community than I have when reading some of this thread.
This is simply wrong - I only care because you claim statistics back you up despite the fact that not only do statistics not back you up but the Flynn effect and correction prove otherwise. IQ has only gone up and up - to such an extent that every decade IQ tests get harder so that 100 remains average - if you scraped into mensa twenty years ago then you would no longer qualify. In fact, this is actually the best proof of how useless IQ tests are as a measure of intelligence as <70 indicates intellectual disability yet if an average person from just over a century ago took a modern test they'd fall within this category despite being intellectually capable.
What is arrogant is saying that vaping to make a nicotine addiction less harmful is okay but vaping to make an addiction to another drug less harmful is not. One of my friends lost an arm to gangrene due to gouching out with a needle left in there. Smoking ...... on foil is so wasteful that few addicts even consider it an option unless they're made of money. Vaping it would have saved his arm.
Legality doesn't equate to morality and denying harm-reduction technology to people because you don't like their drug of choice, rathering that they suffer collapsed nostrils, blown-out veins, frequent infections, risk of sepsis and risk of overdose etc is barbaric. Doing so because you're worried it could affect you is selfish - you do not "have the most to lose", not even close. Even if we're not talking in extremes with illicit substances, just cloud chasing with zero nicotine, what gives you the right to say what others do with their body?
**EDIT: I'm not saying politeness doesn't exist. Don't be a nuisance to others and the larger the clouds you produce the more vigilant you should be to ensure you don't affect/annoy others**
I have mild synaesthesia so this is actually perfectly valid to me - well, I can imagine a couple of brown guitar tones easily, with varying shades and textures to the "brush strokes" (although that isn't a great descriptor of how music forms visually in my head). I don't like any of them by themselves mind you - brown on a classical guitar exists in my mind only as really old bass strings and on electric guitar its a muffled distorted setting that would work in stoner metal and little else.
I can't imagine an orange piano tone no matter how hard I try - it simply ceases to be a piano tone the moment orange gets involved. In fact I'm struggling to think of any instrument that can produce a solidly orange tone in my head, at best bowed stringed instruments occasionally produce flickers of orange amidst light browns, golds and whites. Some electronically produced music paints lots of orange though![]()
I think it's interesting that you use the term " vape pen".
I've been a part of vaping for a VERY long time and the only time I hear " vape pen" or people calling ejuice "oil" is when it's mentioned by people who " partake".
I'm sorry if I personally offended you or someone you know.
I can PM you the study...we could go back and forth , but one thing is for sure, you cannot disprove what I have said
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
That's not vaping. That just means you are a sucker.If I do not press fire button I can hold the vape far, far, far.... longer... and there is ABSOLUTELY no vapor at all....the ultimate stealth vaping is just to suck hard enough without pressing fire button so one or two drops of e-liquid get on your lips or tongue... but I really hate berserker style of vaping....![]()
So there is absolutely no truth to this? IQ scores are falling and have been for decades - CNN
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
I don't know what you mean by the "partake" bit and I've never heard someone refer to e juice as oils myself. Perhaps that's why I don't understand how someone could be offended by what you've just said. When I say vape pen that's just what people near me refer to eGo style batteries with simple atomisers as, I thought it was a ubiquitous term.
I literally can disprove what you've said and did so - every decade a panel is assembled to reset the world average IQ to 100 by increasing the boundaries. It's called the Flynn effect and is well documented. IQ is a terrible measure of intelligence and the scientist for which this effect is named actually talks about how this effect is proof of the inadequacy of IQ testing as a measure of intelligence. The only way you can find studies saying that IQ is decreasing is by looking at small samples, not global population.
Developing nations show the fastest increase, developed nations have slowed down and some cases e.g. the UK there is a decrease but globally IQ scores will not plateau until the entire world develops to a point where IQ test-style "intelligence" is ubiquitously necessary rather than unequally spread due to variance in employment opportunities i.e. farming doesn't require the kind of intelligence measured by IQ tests whereas training to be an engineer or physicist - jobs not remotely on the radar of an impoverished person in sub saharan africa trying to make ends meet - do require this.
Go ahead and send me some studies, here's a meta review of 271 studies from the last century: One Century of Global IQ Gains: A Formal Meta-Analysis of the Flynn Effect (1909-2013). - PubMed - NCBI
Here's another meta-review of 285 studies:
The Flynn effect: a meta-analysis. - PubMed - NCBI
Here's the wikipedia page on the Flynn effect as that seems to be eluding you
Flynn effect - Wikipedia
"The Flynn effect is the substantial and long-sustained increase in both fluid and crystallized intelligence test scores measured in many parts of the world over the 20th century.[1] When intelligence quotient (IQ) tests are initially standardized using a sample of test-takers, by convention the average of the test results is set to 100 and their standard deviation is set to 15 or 16 IQ points. When IQ tests are revised, they are again standardized using a new sample of test-takers, usually born more recently than the first. Again, the average result is set to 100. However, when the new test subjects take the older tests, in almost every case their average scores are significantly above 100."
I can't find a single review that concludes contrary to what I've said because, as I've stated and for some reason have to reiterate for you, IQ has been going up at approximately 3 points per decade and IQ testing facilities correct for this every decade so that IQ can always be defined as a scale where 100 is average and the standard deviation is 15. Like how celsius is defined where 0 is the triple point of water and 100 is the boiling point, each at 1 atmosphere pressure, that is how this scale is defined - the difference being that IQ test scores are not permanent physical characteristics of the universe but measurements of social characteristics. Saying that IQ is going down is like saying the boiling point of water is 50 and the triple point is 100 - sure, if your scale is defined that way then that is true but the units are certainly not celsius, kelvin or fahrenheit and you're needlessly reversing the direction of the scale.
Precisely so.That's not vaping. That just means you are a sucker.![]()
@RossumI agree. It doesn't necessarily equate to DL vaping either, but lots of people conflate the terms. I'm very much MTl (and there's a reason the 'l' is lower-case), but I haven't used a coil over 1 ohm in roughly 4 years now.
Using 'sub-ohm' coils is just ONE way of increasing power dissipated. You can just as easily (with more batteries, or a modern power supply) raise the voltage and hence current, dissipating more power.
The term of 'sub-ohming' is a bit of a throwback to when everything was a mech mod. That said, in order to get a lot of coil surface area with high power, and not have to tote heavy mods, lowering the resistance does that handily.
As Rossum said, you can still turn it down and get a suitable 'MTL' draw, without all that heat!
Kaifuns and the like do one job, and do it to the satisfaction of many people. Newer equipment is definitely trying to cover more tastes with the same equipment, that is how you get market share...I'd like to think many of us old schoolers, like to think of MTL as a tight cigarette draw. This was always the case for me. This also why even the new "mtl" devices rarely work for me.
I want that tight draw but at the same time getting a moutfull of flavour godness. Which so far nothing has been able to give except the old school gear.
Only thing i've yet to try is the berserker though, so i'll give that one a pass. I had high hopes for the siren v2. But still wasn't my kind of a thing.