Sub,
If you took the time to read the proposed FDA regs, you would should have seen phrases like "some people believe e-cigarettes are safer than smoking", contextually implying that this is an unfounded and mistaken belief. If you share this belief, let is know so we can give up on this discussion.
If you read Carl Phillips' response on behalf of the CASAA, you will plainly see that that the regulations were very poorly written, very poorly researched (and use citations so badly it would be a failure as a research paper), and very clearly biased against e-cigarette use.
If you had followed the issue, you would know that if the FDA wants to pass these regulations, there is nothing stopping them. If Congress decides to stop the regulations, they will need to propose and pass a bill themselves (fat chance). You would also know that the FDA receives approximately 40% of it's funding by approval fees for food and drugs: the pharmaceutical industry keeps the FDA alive, and their profits are being cut into by smoking cessation via vaporizing.
If you've paid attention the the CDC, they've also released some very very inept "analysis" on how e-cigarettes are being taken up by children. Can you guess why?
The point is, they've shown their intentions. These groups have negligible interest in public health, and no business regulating what they are very clearly biased against. This is not idle speculation, and will affect the future of vaping in the USA. I never thought about the FDA before this debacle, and now I will never think any good thoughts about them. If I may, "just because we're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after us".
I do apologize for the further derailment of the thread, but the FDA is in no sense our friend, and I do believe all vapers should be aware of this fact.
None of this matters....Sub is convinced that profits and customer care/satisfaction are not synonymous and that a federal regulatory agency will be the ultimate arbiter. We as consumers are too stupid to decide these issues for ourselves.