If that were true then restaurants and bar owners would be able to decide to allow smoking or vaping in their establishments. Around here, in an establishment where food is served (excluding bar snacks) or where anyone under 21 is allowed they are prohibited from allowing smoking regardless of what the owner wants.
Quite so. This anti-smoking, ANTZ thing has become so mainstream that it seems 'My property, my rules' actually only apply when 'the rules' are the 'right' ones...
On one hand, it is acceptable to rule 'no-smoking' in my property, and also in
private property belonging to others (The car example)
On the other hand, it is not acceptable to rule 'smoking allowed' in
my property, only... go figure...
Here in Portugal, the situation is still different, fortunately... if the establishment is larger than 100 square meters, the owner
may create a separate smoking area inside. (No more than 30 per cent of the total area). Smaller than 100 square meters, space division is considered unpractical, so the owner can actually
choose if the
entire establishment will be smoking or no-smoking. Either way (separate area or complete establishment ), smoking status may be revoked by authorities if minimum standards of air quality are not achieved (by lack of air extraction/filtering equipment, for instance). So, usually the owner only has to consider if the investment in said equipment will be justified. Usually, yes: Maybe only around 30 per cent of the
general population smokes, but that percentage can easily rise to 60-70 per cent if you consider only the group of people who usually go to cafes/bars.
So, I believe our system is
still a balanced one. For how long, I cannot imagine...