So I was reading a number of articles related to vaping and one thing I noticed about articles critical to e cigarettes is the claim that children are targeted by e-cig retailers and will become hooked into a sordid life of vaping antifreeze and car tail pipes.
I gave this some thought.
In order to purchase an e-cig, you either have to show up to a retailer in person, show an ID, and pay a minimum of $10 USD to buy a disposable that will last about an hour, or $100 for a rechargeable. Your other option to is to purchase over the internet, where I'll grant you, no IDs are checked. However, your average purchase amount is going to be around $50 and you need a valid credit card, plus a valid physical address.
In either scenario, e-cigs are harder to get ahold of for adults than regular smokes, let alone a kid. Can you imagine the sort of scenario in which a 14 year old would have to go through to secretly purchase an e-cig, covertly receive it in the mail, discretely charge the device, fill the device unseen, and then go to the effort to sneakily use the thing on a regular basis?
Let's face it, cigarettes are easy for a kid who really wants to get his hands on one. Steal a pack, grab a lighter and you're in business.
But kids getting hooked on e-cigs? Seriously? Is this even really an argument? I'm a determined adult who really wants to use this product, and I still get fed up and lose interest. Fuggitaboudit if I were a kid. Too much work and too many chances to get busted. I understand some parents don't give a crap about watching their kids, but that doesn't negate the fact that e-cigs are kind of a PIA to figure out, even when you are an exceptionally motivated adult who has the patience, the drive, and have the financial means to do so.
I think we all agree that under age smoking (or any smoking for that matter) is a bad thing. But really, anti-smoking groups hanging their hat on the argument that Someone Must Protect The Children From The Evil E- Cigzzzz!!!!11!!!!!! is pretty stupid, IMHO.
If anti smoking groups really want to help out, they should be in favor of third party, peer reviewed research into the safety and effectiveness (or lack thereof!) of e-cigs. But fact finding isn't nearly as fun as rhetoric, I suppose.
I gave this some thought.
In order to purchase an e-cig, you either have to show up to a retailer in person, show an ID, and pay a minimum of $10 USD to buy a disposable that will last about an hour, or $100 for a rechargeable. Your other option to is to purchase over the internet, where I'll grant you, no IDs are checked. However, your average purchase amount is going to be around $50 and you need a valid credit card, plus a valid physical address.
In either scenario, e-cigs are harder to get ahold of for adults than regular smokes, let alone a kid. Can you imagine the sort of scenario in which a 14 year old would have to go through to secretly purchase an e-cig, covertly receive it in the mail, discretely charge the device, fill the device unseen, and then go to the effort to sneakily use the thing on a regular basis?
Let's face it, cigarettes are easy for a kid who really wants to get his hands on one. Steal a pack, grab a lighter and you're in business.
But kids getting hooked on e-cigs? Seriously? Is this even really an argument? I'm a determined adult who really wants to use this product, and I still get fed up and lose interest. Fuggitaboudit if I were a kid. Too much work and too many chances to get busted. I understand some parents don't give a crap about watching their kids, but that doesn't negate the fact that e-cigs are kind of a PIA to figure out, even when you are an exceptionally motivated adult who has the patience, the drive, and have the financial means to do so.
I think we all agree that under age smoking (or any smoking for that matter) is a bad thing. But really, anti-smoking groups hanging their hat on the argument that Someone Must Protect The Children From The Evil E- Cigzzzz!!!!11!!!!!! is pretty stupid, IMHO.
If anti smoking groups really want to help out, they should be in favor of third party, peer reviewed research into the safety and effectiveness (or lack thereof!) of e-cigs. But fact finding isn't nearly as fun as rhetoric, I suppose.