Most of the "bans" in Kentucky are related to the public health, the proverbial "greater good". I think challenges to these are not likely to be successful due to the amount of money it would take to show that there is no rational nexus between the ban and the public health. We have so slipped over the edge that a concept that a private business may have an right to make its own rules for its customers is nearly anathema, incomprehensible, to the public.
These public health bans have a wealth of emotional, if not intellectual appeal. They are "for the children" or for those downtrodden victims who have no choice but to endure the rampaging harm done to them. Emotionally engendered laws or ordinances are so easy for pandering politicians simply because they require, perhaps even have as a prerequisite, no thought.
Consequently, I think "ban" challenges are more costly than beneficial. [All obligatory disclaimers are included by reference in to this post.]
No.
It's agenda based legislation hidden behind the lie of public health.
The public is too concerned with the latest spin, and being "politically correct" they they don't even care to notice what's happening under their noses.
It's all about profit and control of money.
The ONLY way to prevent this from happening is to vote the criminals out of office.
We can't play the "lobby" game and win. We are seriously out gunned.
I haven't see anything from CASSA that impresses me.
I'd love to see their gameplan. I'd love to get on board, but it takes more than talk and a loose, vague plan of action.
Id like to see CASSA get behind a candidate for an elected offic. Someone who understands our cause.
Even on a local level.
Show me something substantial and show me the game plan or count me out.
I don't blindly follow anything.
