I heard vivi nova's silica wick is not safe, will this help?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ynot531

Full Member
Verified Member
Sep 5, 2012
60
18
66
Brooklyn, NY
i was told by a well respected veteran that as long as i do not get dry hits i should not have a problem.. he said key word "should not." i do not get dry hits, so maybe i am being too cautious. but oh well.

yes, the best thing would be to use something other than silica. cotton? it burns. if you dry hit on silica, you will burn cotton. believe me, it burns. i am looking into candle wicks. yes, i have ss mesh attys but i love the viva, i just need to find another wick that i like.

until then, i cut a couple of small pieces of the blue foam we use to use in our carts, push it up into the drip tip and hope it filters any silica that happens to come its way.

i quit smoking to be healthy not to replace it with something that is harmful as well.

sure alot of people will say "well, we know what smoking does." yeah yeah yeah and we ALSO know what silica does.

heck, we also know what diacetyl, acetoin and acetyl propionyl do to your lungs and some folks continue to vape it. Not me...

i quit smoking and started vaping to be healthier, not pick up another habit that could further damage my lungs. I will take precautions.

Well said. Totally agree!
 

nebulas

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 30, 2011
1,250
682
Earth
This is from an experiment that the OP of that thread, EvilGrym, did.
silica needles(1).jpg

Here he describes his airborne particle experiment.
<Snip> placed the wick near the glass about 5 mm distance and put power on. it boils and vapor condenced on glass. Another man tested exhaled vapour and found particles in it. I suspect, that microblasts can brake silica fiber producing this particles.
<SNIP>
 

Angel Wings

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2010
379
389
I Be's A Texas Girl
You can use a cotton wick i'm told. But then you want a unbleached uncolored one I would think.

Just be careful. IT BURNS. Trust me, i only needed one experience to say, woopsie, ok this goes in the trash.

That is why cartos etc. are not being made with cotton wicks. A lot of the vendors forums i visit, the vendor want even talk about using cotton to rewick with because of this.

Due to pg intolerance, I am forced to vape vg liquids. I don't care how much I thin it, it just doesnt wick for me like pg did. Between the vg and my vaping technique, cotton is a no go for me.

Just please be careful with it if you decide to use it.
 
Last edited:

Buggs5347

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 12, 2012
2,450
3,143
Arizona
This is from an experiment that the OP of that thread, EvilGrym, did.
View attachment 136323

Here he describes his airborne particle experiment.

I'd be willing to bet that you could take anyone, even a non smoker or non vaper and have them exhale onto a glass slide and see particles under a microscope. JMHO
 

NancyR

Account closed on request
ECF Veteran
Apr 25, 2012
7,927
13,419
Washington State
Just be careful. IT BURNS. Trust me, i only needed one experience to say, woopsie, ok this goes in the trash.

That is why cartos etc. are not being made with cotton wicks. A lot of the vendors forums i visit, the vendor want even talk about using cotton to rewick with because of this.

Due to pg intolerance, I am forced to vape vg liquids. I don't care how much I thin it, it just doesnt wick for me like pg did. Between the vg and my vaping technique, cotton is a no go for me.

Just please be careful with it if you decide to use it.

AngelWings I am one of the people that do use cotton, and I actually found it wicked better for me, however I do understand your concern and VG can be a pain in anything other than SS, they do have some tho that have done ss wicks in the vivi novas
 

NancyR

Account closed on request
ECF Veteran
Apr 25, 2012
7,927
13,419
Washington State
Yea, I guess it would work if you still have analogs laying around.

I have been analog free for 2+ years now so I don't have any. I don't think I will go pay $6 or $7, what ever the price is now, for a pack of cigs to tear out the filter. Hehe. Blue foam is your friend. Haha

Most smoke shops sell filters for RYO, usually less than $2 for a bag of them.
 

Angel Wings

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2010
379
389
I Be's A Texas Girl
AngelWings I am one of the people that do use cotton, and I actually found it wicked better for me, however I do understand your concern and VG can be a pain in anything other than SS, they do have some tho that have done ss wicks in the vivi novas

Thanks Nancyr. Vg is a pain. The vivi's have been the first and only tank that wicks the vg for me.

I have seen the ss wick mod for the vivi. I have a Skype scheduled this weekend with someone who is going to help me with this. My saving grace...haha
 
Last edited:

Angel Wings

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2010
379
389
I Be's A Texas Girl
Most smoke shops sell filters for RYO, usually less than $2 for a bag of them.

I have not smoked in so long I have no idea what is readily available. What ever works, GO FOR IT. Haha

With the blue foam, when my drip tip needs washing, I pull the foam out, soak it in PGA with the drip tip, let it air dry and push it right back in the drip tip.

What ever works for someone, I say run with it. :closedeyes: I don't think there is a right or wrong way to accomplish this goal.
 

nebulas

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 30, 2011
1,250
682
Earth
I'd be willing to bet that you could take anyone, even a non smoker or non vaper and have them exhale onto a glass slide and see particles under a microscope. JMHO

It should also be noted that the image is not from exhaled vapor. The microscopic image was from putting a clean microscope slide above the atomizer with a silica wick. The PV was then activated causing vapor to rise from the coils up to the slide where condensation of the vapor occurred.

There was someone in this thread that was mentioning doing some tests with a microscope. If he could do some control tests on the exhaled vapor, then that would be great. I don't know that a control test is needed for the condensation test but another condensation test wouldn't hurt. The more data, the better.
 

AttyPops

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2010
8,708
134,955
Hc Svnt Dracones - USA EST
Yeah... it's the INHALED (not exhaled) vapor that we'd want to test....just in case there's more chance of shards. IDK how to set that up though. Glass slide with container around it inhaled through one end, e-cig at the other and slide in the middle?

BTW I'd want to see this with a regular atomizer too. I don't believe it's specific to the VN...atomizers and clearos in general I would think.
 

Boden

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
5,516
28,164
Lexington KY
It should also be noted that the image is not from exhaled vapor. The microscopic image was from putting a clean microscope slide above the atomizer with a silica wick. The PV was then activated causing vapor to rise from the coils up to the slide where condensation of the vapor occurred.

There was someone in this thread that was mentioning doing some tests with a microscope. If he could do some control tests on the exhaled vapor, then that would be great. I don't know that a control test is needed for the condensation test but another condensation test wouldn't hurt. The more data, the better.

Good idea, Will do.
 

Boden

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
5,516
28,164
Lexington KY
Is it possible to measure the size of the silica under a microscope? i have read small particles around 3 microns can get deep into the lung and can not be cleaned out.

You are correct It's the really small bits that you need to be worried about. The other thread showed particles that were much too large to be concerned about. Yes I will be able to mesure the particle sizes down to .05µ
 

Boden

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
5,516
28,164
Lexington KY
I do want to give some frame of reference to anyone reading this. The amount of silica needed to do any real damage is huge and normally takes between 10 and 25 years of exposure to do enough damage to notice. Even if i find sub micron particles it is likely that you could vape for years and you would get less silica in your lungs than spending a week at the beach. (silica sand dust is the principal component of sand :O)

from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001191/

Silica is a common, naturally-occurring crystal. It is found in most rock beds and forms dust during mining, quarrying, tunneling, and working with many metal ores. Silica is a main part of sand, so glass workers and sand-blasters are also exposed to silica.

Three types of silicosis ocur:

Simple chronic silicosis -- results from long-term exposure (more than 20 years) to low amounts of silica dust. The silica dust causes swelling in the lungs and chest lymph nodes. This disease may cause people to have trouble breathing. This is the most common form of silicosis.

Accelerated silicosis -- occurs after exposure to larger amounts of silica over a shorter period of time (5 - 15 years). Swelling in the lungs and symptoms occur faster than in simple silicosis.

Acute silicosis -- results from short-term exposure to very large amounts of silica. The lungs become very inflamed and can fill with fluid, causing severe shortness of breath and low blood oxygen levels.

Progressive massive fibrosis can occur in either simple or accelerated silicosis, but is more common in the accelerated form. Progressive massive fibrosis causes severe lung scarring and destroys normal lung structures.

People who work in jobs where they are exposed to silica dust are at risk. These jobs include:

Abrasives manufacturing

Glass manufacturing

Mining

Quarrying

Road and building construction

Sand blasting

Stone cutting

Intense exposure to silica can cause disease within a year, but it usually takes at least 10 - 15 years of exposure before symptoms occur. Silicosis has become less common since the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) created regulations requiring the use of protective equipment, which limits the amount of silica dust workers inhale.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread