Yeah, I just checked too, and was going to post. Theirs does have a thinner outter wire though, so it would probably be pretty good, I think I'm going to try it out.Just checked, it's 26ga core.
Yeah, I just checked too, and was going to post. Theirs does have a thinner outter wire though, so it would probably be pretty good, I think I'm going to try it out.Just checked, it's 26ga core.
I had an easier time with wrapping 26 than I did wrapping 28 so if I could buy some, that would be nice.
I used to call them lungers, now I is one.I happen to be a proud modwhomper myself and have invented the term "steamthrower" as a semi derogatory descriptor for the cloud chasers![]()
Yeah, I wrap mine with 36g n80.I'm going to try SS Claptons. I'll let everyone know how it goes. I'm waiting til I get paid again, then I'll put in an order for different gauges/grades.
I'm also thinking you could wrap it in kanthal if needed?
I was thinking the same thing. I also wondered about fused 28 ga Kanthal with a superfine SS wrap... Will keep the resistance up a bit, making it easier to run dual fused claptons...
Yes, dissimilar wraps are possible. You can buy such wires. If you make the core Kanthal or Ni80, and are careful to unwind the Clapton wrap a bit before trapping the leg in the post, you can gain the resistance of the core only, but the surface area of a Clapton, at the expense of some ramp-up time, as the core wire has to heat the wrap by conduction.I'm going to try SS Claptons. I'll let everyone know how it goes. I'm waiting til I get paid again, then I'll put in an order for different gauges/grades.
I'm also thinking you could wrap it in kanthal if needed?
quite correct. Current flow in parallel conductors is inverse to the ratio on their resistance. If one conductor has 90% of the combined resistance, it will carry 10% of the load. But do the math: if you put 50 watts on that example, on a total resistance of .4 ohms, you're actually putting 45 watts on .04 ohms, and 5 watts on .36 ohms. Obviously, 5 watts will barely warm .36 ohms this side of forever, so you're effectively "wasting" 10% of your applied power, and this makes a difference in ramp up time albeit it may not be a great one. There is also the consideration, in TC mode, of "spoofing" the algorithm into thinking it has .4 ohms of TC wire, when it only actually has .04 ohms.If you don't unwrap the Clapton, I still would have thought there would be minimal current flow through the Clapton, as the path of least resistance will be through the core. Even if the outer wrap is made of something with less resistance, it is still of significantly higher resistance due to the tiny diameter and length of the Clapton wire compared to the much shorter length and larger diameter of the core. Just a question, not trying to contradict... I think all claptons heat by conduction, whether isolated or trapped in the leads. The only reason I knew of to unwrap is because of post holes that are too small....
quite correct. Current flow in parallel conductors is inverse to the ratio on their resistance. If one conductor has 90% of the combined resistance, it will carry 10% of the load. But do the math: if you put 50 watts on that example, on a total resistance of .4 ohms, you're actually putting 45 watts on .04 ohms, and 5 watts on .36 ohms. Obviously, 5 watts will barely warm .36 ohms this side of forever, so you're effectively "wasting" 10% of your applied power, and this makes a difference in ramp up time albeit it may not be a great one. There is also the consideration, in TC mode, of "spoofing" the algorithm into thinking it has .4 ohms of TC wire, when it only actually has .04 ohms.