Cleaning them is the fun part for me lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was thinking the same thing...but then I like tearing things apart just to see how it works from the inside out then putting it back together. That's a way to really know your device and with mechs there is t much to them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I actually do that with most every tool I buy.
I tear it apart and see how its assembled, so I can understand how it works and how to service it.
As a point of reference; on a number of my regulated mod's I run firmwares that displays resistance to milliohms (.001Ω)How do you measure resistances that low, and how do you know you're not at .06 or even .05Ω?
Sent from my K6000 Pro using Tapatalk
As a point of reference; on a number of my regulated mod's I run firmwares that displays resistance to milliohms (.001Ω)
Example below (all day mech vape resistance checked on one of my reg-mods):
![]()
If the mod resistance test results are repeatable (reads same from one test to another - just checked that same atty now and measures 0.094) then I consider the results acceptable.The hardware in the mod isn't accurate, regardless of the firmware.
Ohm readers that are accurate enough to correctly mesure 1/1000th of an Ohm cost much more than that mod.
I wouldn't trust anything to be 100% accurate when measuring that low.Calibrated Multi meter at work and then a ohm reader at home I would. Never trust a home 20$ ohm reader fully on a build like that
All of our stuff is on a 30 day calibration cycle
I work part time for a aerospace company that has department of defense contracts
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doesn't mean that it's accurate. Highly doubful, in fact. Any small interference will have a huge impact at very low resistances.As a point of reference; on a number of my regulated mod's I run firmwares that displays resistance to milliohms (.001Ω)
Example below (all day mech vape resistance checked on one of my reg-mods):
![]()
Sure, but with mechs and dangerously low resistances you really need dead-on accuracy.If the mod resistance test results are repeatable (reads same from one test to another - just checked that same atty now and measures 0.094) then I consider the results acceptable.
Changed to another mod and get slightly higher reading (0.102) that is also repeatable on that mod. Again totally acceptable in my mind. Run a resistance offset on the mod to calibrate if it matters that much. To me, reg-mods display approximate resistance values. So long as the value is consistent from one test to another that's what matters to me.
I have one mod that reads batteries slightly off from actual and results in battery imbalance issue at about 1/2 capacity. I run BOV (Battery Offset Value) to calibrate the bat-1 & bat-2 readings and all is good.
Every device potentially reads differently unless calibrated to a standard.
RE: "Dead on accuracy"Sure, but with mechs and dangerously low resistances you really need dead-on accuracy.
Sent from my K6000 Pro using Tapatalk
RE: "Dead on accuracy"
Please describe your tolerance.
For my needs .005 accuracy is acceptable. What is your level of acceptability.
There's simply no way your meter is that accurate. You're making an error in thinking that the difference in the reading between the mods is what matters. Either of the readings could easily be off by .01Ω or more.RE: "Dead on accuracy"
Please describe your tolerance.
For my needs .005 accuracy is acceptable. What is your level of acceptability.
I wouldn't trust anything to be 100% accurate when measuring that low.
Sent from my K6000 Pro using Tapatalk
RE: "Dead on accuracy"
Please describe your tolerance.
For my needs .005 accuracy is acceptable. What is your level of acceptability.