I'm not TRYING to win an argument. That's the whole point and why I haven't and dont' become "viscious". Its not a matter of desperation for me.
Even the people arguing against me have said in the topics that I have not been viscious and that I have been polite. So I do take exception to having my posts characterized otherwise.
All I've ever said is that based on the limits I've seen, as well as thoughts from Dr. F. and Dr. Hubbs, I have concerns about vaping DA and AP, which don't even have to be in ejuice.
Like I said, it is my own personal decision to trust vape-friendly medical researchers (who are NOT anti-vaping, who are not ANTZ) because they have no financial incentive to their pronouncements........over politicians, vaping activists, and bottle fillers who are less able to be as objective for obvious reasons and who do not have medical/research training.
If some vendors want to eventually prove, with actual peer reviewed published studies, that I need not be concerned, then I will re-consider my decision NOT to vape AP and DA.
Where it stands now is that it has taken me over a year just to get test results from vendors, and then it seems like some of them turn out to be HUGE arguments about who did it, if they did it correctly, what the lab settings were, the dates it was done, and differences between their own labs and somebody else's labs, etc.
In other words, a ton of obsfucation.
I don't need it. I'm not here to protect anyone's brand or bash it either. All I want is straight numbers......not excuses about numbers.
Now, unfortunately, we not only have members attacking other members, but vendors attacking members here (basically, calling Steve an ANTZ).
It's really getting out of hand.
The vendors on here posting are upset because they can't make an e liquid anyone would buy without it being laden with diacetyl, AP or butyric acid. Mix some Hangsen with 20% diacetyl and it would probably fly off the shelves... I wouldn't be shocked if thats what some vendors are doing...