Jeff Steir on the Jim Bohannon re: e-cigs

Status
Not open for further replies.

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Excellent show on e-cigarettes. Mr. Bohannon rocks on e-cigs!

Jim Bohannon: The Jim Bohannon Show Archives

Comments on e-cigs start at about 53:56 minutes - you can drag the player forward to advance in the show without having to listen to the whole thing (once the show has fully loaded.)
 
Last edited:

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Great Bohannan quotes from this broadcast:

"If you're addicted to something that's not harming your body otherwise, it's not great but it'd be better than something that's tearing your lungs apart."

"So why would there be a war [against e-cigarettes] in the first place against that? ...why would the government be opposed to this at all? I mean, is there something in these e-cigarettes that is even worse than tobacco? Which I add, by the way, is a VERY rhetorical question."

"Are these people brain dead? Have none of them in fact actually touched tobacco? Are they that removed from reality? How..I mean, do these people need an instruction manual to even breathe? I mean, this is pretty stupid!"

"Now, when we...when we reach this level of stupidity, here, it boggles the imagination that anybody is really that obtuse. Then you have to start asking the question, whether it's...it's the answer is yes or not, you have to at least ask the question. Rather than assume anybody is that brain-dead, vacuum-headed stupid, is there some special interest at work here that somehow stands to gain from this because, again, I...I can't believe people are actually this stupid, can even breathe without a little note in front of them that says 'inhale, exhale.' I mean, who...who would stand to benefit from this in terms of a special interest group?"

"...If you're going to talk about the residual effects of the nicotine, why then is not a similar crusade being mounted against the nicotine gum or the patches? Because that's the only thing...I...I don't see the difference really. In...in all three cases, e-cigarettes, nicotine gum and patches, you're talking about the ingestion of nicotine without the harmful products of tobacco. Why are these not lumped together in the minds of Senator Lautenberg and others?"

"Whatever, that's beside the point. If it gets people to quit, whatever. I...Anything short of suicide is worth pursuing in terms of getting people off of cigarettes!"

[on e-cigs being a gateway to smoking] "Oh, that is utter horse crap! That is the most non-sensical thing I ever heard in my life. Yet, kids are lined up to get e-cigarettes. [laughs] Again, when you reach this level...and I'll say the word again, stupidity...I am really challenged to believe anybody's that dumb. There has to be an alterior motive here."
 
Last edited:
The ulterior motive is one or more of the following motivations listed in order of increasing financial interests:


-Switching from combustible cigarettes to smoke-free alternatives could result in a drastic reduction of annual deaths attributed to tobacco use. (Financial impact: Population control is good for "the economy")
-Switching from combustible cigarettes to smoke-free alternatives could result in fewer people paying for cigarettes and the accompanying "sin" taxes, settlements and entitlements. (Financial impact: Approx $80B/yr spent on cigarettes, over half of which is absorbed by Public Health agencies and corporations through taxes and the Master Settlement Agreement)
-Switching from combustible cigarettes to smoke free alternatives could result in fewer people purchasing smoking cessation pharmaceuticals or health care and services to treat addiction and chronic diseases like COPD that have been linked to chronic smoking. (Financial impact: Approx $96.7B/yr spent on health care and services)
-Switching from combustible cigarettes to smoke-free alternatives could result in people discovering that tobacco products are not inherently immoral but something many adults in a free society may reasonably choose to use for therapeutic OR recreational purposes. (Financial impact: Free from the 'quit or die' trap, tobacco users can no longer be seen as the scapegoat of the health and financial costs of corporate profiteering.)
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Yeah, some of Steir's comments didn't sit well with me. Like seeming to deny there was any "special interest" behind the opposition and the claim that no one should ever start using nicotine for ANY reason. That negates the benefits many people get from nicotine, makes nicotine users seem like they are just foolish addicts and ignores recent research that nicotine may help people suffering from some neurological diseases.
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread