Jimbill, when you print out that chart, be sure the crumple it up, and then throw it away. Please don't buy into the indefensible fear-mongering that ChrispyCritter is engaging in here. If anyone can provide a shred of scientific evidence that vaping at up to 14 watts per coil causes any detectable harm to one's health, I would love to see it. Failing that, I don't want to hear any more wild speculation based on some smudges on some polyfill, or tanks that make someone go ouchy-ouch.
Dittos. Chrispy, just please give it up. What you're saying about the health risks of vaping at up to 14 watts per coil is completely contrary to what I have heard anywhere else. Not from PBusardo, Scott the English guy, any other single reviewer, or in any thread that I have ever read here, or from anyone I have ever talked to>
I realize you've taken a lot of stuff apart, and know something about electronics, but we have a choice here. We can either assume that you are correct and everyone else is wrong, or we can go with the obvious; that the reverse is much more accurate.
I'm sure you're familiar with Occam's Razor, which simply states that when one is confronted with a multitude of possibilities, that the most likely one is generally the correct one. Here again, it doesn't look good for you.
Lastly, your expressed views bring to mind a saying coined by the late, very great Carl Sagan; "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".
"The origins of the saying can perhaps be found in Hume’s Maxim:
'No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish…'
Replace “miracle” with “extraordinary claim”, and you have the basis of the quote that Carl Sagan popularized. And intuitively, most people would agree with it in principle. For example, if I told you I had cereal for breakfast, you would probably believe me. You know cereal exists and that people eat it for breakfast. Of course, I could be lying, but even if I were, I have not asked you to accept some new and extraordinary idea. (The fact that I lied wouldn’t mean that cereal somehow doesn’t exist any more.) However, if I told you that the cereal I eat every day will guarantee that I will never get sick and will live to be 100, you would probably want some evidence of that, and some pretty good evidence too.
Strictly speaking, all claims require exactly the same amount of evidence, it’s just that most "ordinary" claims are already backed by extraordinary evidence that you don’t think about. When we say “extraordinary claims”, what we actually mean are claims that do not already have evidence supporting them, or sometimes claims that have extraordinary evidence against them. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence because they usually contradict claims that are backed by extraordinary evidence. The evidence for the extraordinary claim must support the new claim as well as explain why the old claims that are now being abandoned, previously appeared to be correct. The extraordinary evidence must account for the abandoned claim, while also explaining the new one".
http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2008/01/extraordinary-c.html
So if you have any extraordinary evidence, other than the far from extraordinary (IMO) evidence you've presented thus far, for your claims about the health hazards of vaping at the wattages I've been referring to, please do share. (But maybe not in bold red, please)?