I am going to the machine shop to see what is going on and I will contact you later about justGG CT and Ody base.
Just GG
- Thread starter imeothanasis
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Happy to report that 1st run/2nd run ody to gg adapters fit fine and all the way down. Iatty 1st run fits fine also and leaving less than 1mm gap, but they all fit fine. As well as Ithaka base.
Thank you Imeo for creating JustGG, Ive been waiting for the one piece look for awhile now, and you created one LOL. Although it was done for the GG stealth mini mode, awhile back, glad you did it for JustGG
Thank you for making round BEVEL brass fire button..my palm wont hurt as much as round flat brass fire button... back then I voted for Hex/Round Bevel Brass fire button and was outvoted by the majority in the GG group. It was still fun voting for sure.
Thank you Imeo for creating JustGG, Ive been waiting for the one piece look for awhile now, and you created one LOL. Although it was done for the GG stealth mini mode, awhile back, glad you did it for JustGG
Thank you for making round BEVEL brass fire button..my palm wont hurt as much as round flat brass fire button... back then I voted for Hex/Round Bevel Brass fire button and was outvoted by the majority in the GG group. It was still fun voting for sure.
after months of waiting.. finally got my Just GG.
Thanks Imeo, fine work you done sir.
Thanks Imeo, fine work you done sir.
Imeo mine doesn't sit completely flush. It sits very very close 1mm or less but mine has the same issue as yours. Also on visual inspection my ody base thread portion is much longer then Ithaka's so I see why the issue is there. And my Ody base was first run. I may gently take a wire brush to the ct threads when I get a chance in case there is anything in there that can easily be cleaned out but I have put my full JGG through 10 sonic clean cycles as well as used a bath towel to clean all threads as much as I can. This isn't a huge issue for me since the gap is very small and it works but I do understand the disappointment from others.
Last edited:
Maybe someone with a non-threading Ody can send their base to an owner/friend that has one that threads for kicks? I wish I could participate but, my JGG #0315 is in Greece for a bit of fun in the sun with my approval.
Imeo I have to say Bravo and thank you for the JGG.
I am very happy with my new JGG. While I will admit I was worried about the engravings seeing them in person I can understand why you went this route. Now that doesn't mean I wouldn't be the first on the bandwagon to get a bottom tube with the classic engravings but what I have already started to love I am sure will continue to get even better with time. (I am normally a traditionalist and hate change but I love my JGG engravings and all)
I won't say JGG is better then GGTS I love them both and they are both great devices. I will say I like the new features a lot. The new venting slots look good IMHO. I also like the new battery post. I like that you can use it as is. Or bypass the spring, or put a fuse kit in it. I like the longer telescope that combined with the dual top tubes will allow even more battery configurations then ever before out of the box. I like that the new collector tank is smaller and just as adjustable as the old. I like the fact that I can now use a 510 tank without having to buy an additional adapter. Although I can see where 901/808 users might not like it as much. (I know I know it is a dying connector but some people still use them I am sure). And I like the new air flow controller. No visable threads is nice and it is just as easy if not easier to use then before. And it is at basically the same price as the GGTS.
All in all I would say it is a great device. I am sure it will be a great part of my vaping arsenal for a long long time. But I will repeat Capt Steve's disappointment that this will be the only batch. And I really hope I can get my hands on a Brass version.
Although and I know this is going to sound crazy. But if I could change 1 thing it would be that the tubes lined up perfectly on the inside like they did with the GGTS. I know it is weird but I always liked that the seam between the tubes on the GGTS were perfectly flush so it was as perfect inside as out.
Thanks again Imeo for another great GG Device!!
I am very happy with my new JGG. While I will admit I was worried about the engravings seeing them in person I can understand why you went this route. Now that doesn't mean I wouldn't be the first on the bandwagon to get a bottom tube with the classic engravings but what I have already started to love I am sure will continue to get even better with time. (I am normally a traditionalist and hate change but I love my JGG engravings and all
)I won't say JGG is better then GGTS I love them both and they are both great devices. I will say I like the new features a lot. The new venting slots look good IMHO. I also like the new battery post. I like that you can use it as is. Or bypass the spring, or put a fuse kit in it. I like the longer telescope that combined with the dual top tubes will allow even more battery configurations then ever before out of the box. I like that the new collector tank is smaller and just as adjustable as the old. I like the fact that I can now use a 510 tank without having to buy an additional adapter. Although I can see where 901/808 users might not like it as much. (I know I know it is a dying connector but some people still use them I am sure). And I like the new air flow controller. No visable threads is nice and it is just as easy if not easier to use then before. And it is at basically the same price as the GGTS.
All in all I would say it is a great device. I am sure it will be a great part of my vaping arsenal for a long long time. But I will repeat Capt Steve's disappointment that this will be the only batch. And I really hope I can get my hands on a Brass version.
Although and I know this is going to sound crazy. But if I could change 1 thing it would be that the tubes lined up perfectly on the inside like they did with the GGTS. I know it is weird but I always liked that the seam between the tubes on the GGTS were perfectly flush so it was as perfect inside as out.
Thanks again Imeo for another great GG Device!!
Last edited:
I got shipping notification on the 7th October from Vassilis and received the GG the next day via Fedex.
my JGG's are in town!!! and Im off for the week. hurry and come to butthead, mailman!!!!
Thank you fright
You said that tubes line perfectly on GGTS. You mean the extension and the engraved tube. They dont line perfectly as they dont line on justGG too because of the telescope. Its the nature of the telescope to not allow this to happen. But as I have said before, you put telescope upside down and they will perfectly line. You cant see it on GGTS because almost never totally close but you can see it on justGG. But I made threads in a way that even if you totally screw telescope on engraved tube, some threads are still exposed, so you can screw there the extension.
I did this to avoid lined problems that may occur and as you will see, I manage to eliminate problems that come from telescope
You said that tubes line perfectly on GGTS. You mean the extension and the engraved tube. They dont line perfectly as they dont line on justGG too because of the telescope. Its the nature of the telescope to not allow this to happen. But as I have said before, you put telescope upside down and they will perfectly line. You cant see it on GGTS because almost never totally close but you can see it on justGG. But I made threads in a way that even if you totally screw telescope on engraved tube, some threads are still exposed, so you can screw there the extension.
I did this to avoid lined problems that may occur and as you will see, I manage to eliminate problems that come from telescope
Imeo I have to say Bravo and thank you for the JGG.
I am very happy with my new JGG. While I will admit I was worried about the engravings seeing them in person I can understand why you went this route. Now that doesn't mean I wouldn't be the first on the bandwagon to get a bottom tube with the classic engravings but what I have already started to love I am sure will continue to get even better with time. (I am normally a traditionalist and hate change but I love my JGG engravings and all
I won't say JGG is better then GGTS I love them both and they are both great devices. I will say I like the new features a lot. The new venting slots look good IMHO. I also like the new battery post. I like that you can use it as is. Or bypass the spring, or put a fuse kit in it. I like the longer telescope that combined with the dual top tubes will allow even more battery configurations then ever before out of the box. I like that the new collector tank is smaller and just as adjustable as the old. I like the fact that I can now use a 510 tank without having to buy an additional adapter. Although I can see where 901/808 users might not like it as much. (I know I know it is a dying connector but some people still use them I am sure). And I like the new air flow controller. No visable threads is nice and it is just as easy if not easier to use then before. And it is at basically the same price as the GGTS.
All in all I would say it is a great device. I am sure it will be a great part of my vaping arsenal for a long long time. But I will repeat Capt Steve's disappointment that this will be the only batch. And I really hope I can get my hands on a Brass version.
Although and I know this is going to sound crazy. But if I could change 1 thing it would be that the tubes lined up perfectly on the inside like they did with the GGTS. I know it is weird but I always liked that the seam between the tubes on the GGTS were perfectly flush so it was as perfect inside as out.
Thanks again Imeo for another great GG Device!!
ok, I just came back from machine shop and we found the problem. It was the fact that I had to be right on the delivery dates that I gave you, so I send half of collector tanks to another machine shop. As you saw, its work was not the proper one, thats why I always avoid to make a partnership with other machine shops. My machine shop is the best in Athens and I will stick with it from now on. No more mistakes.
The solution is that I will send CT to my sellers and everyone with a problem will ask them for a new CT.
ps...... While I was thinking the last few hours of ways to make Ody and Iatty (with their native GGTS base) sit flush on justGG and also still save the few mm of its length as it was my first plan, I found a way to do that. And I will send to my sellers all the remaining CT and the new ones too that I am making now, so you will be able to have your Ody and your Iatty on your justGG without a problem.
The solution is that I will send CT to my sellers and everyone with a problem will ask them for a new CT.
ps...... While I was thinking the last few hours of ways to make Ody and Iatty (with their native GGTS base) sit flush on justGG and also still save the few mm of its length as it was my first plan, I found a way to do that. And I will send to my sellers all the remaining CT and the new ones too that I am making now, so you will be able to have your Ody and your Iatty on your justGG without a problem.
Thank you fright
You said that tubes line perfectly on GGTS. You mean the extension and the engraved tube. They dont line perfectly as they dont line on justGG too because of the telescope. Its the nature of the telescope to not allow this to happen. But as I have said before, you put telescope upside down and they will perfectly line. You cant see it on GGTS because almost never totally close but you can see it on justGG. But I made threads in a way that even if you totally screw telescope on engraved tube, some threads are still exposed, so you can screw there the extension.
I did this to avoid lined problems that may occur and as you will see, I manage to eliminate problems that come from telescope
Actualy I was referring to the inside. On the GGTS if you screwed the telescope to the top tube or 2 top tubes together and ran your finger on the inside you could feel that they threaded together and there was no gap. On my JGG the telescope and the first top tube line up perfectly on the inside but there is a little gap between the top 2 tubes. The outside shows no gaps but on the inside you can feel a small one. This isn't a big deal really but the reason I noticed it on JGG is because I went to push my kick down the tube to take it out and the springs caught on that little gap. Now I know to take it out the top but on all my GGTS top tubes since this tiny gap wasn't there it wasn't an issue.
Either way this was not meant to be a complaint in any sense. I really do think the JGG is a great device.
Be careful, I have two different sets of magnets, one that was donated to me and one that I ordered from Gauss Boyss, and the donated set is 6.0071mm and wont work. Gauss Boys are 5.9309mm and fit perfect. Very tight tolerances.
Dark ~ your awesome. Didn't mean to overstep ~ you just taught me to well. The magnets are sweet but your Sugars 'n Cream cotton is the BOMB
No worries buddy, just yankin your chain.
There is some great pictures up here. Went out of town for the night so my gg is sitting in my mailbox Cant wait to pick it up later today
Cant wait to pick it up later today I know that it was not a complain fright, I was just thought that you addressed an issue that exists on GGTS too.
The reason that I made tubes like this is that some older GGTS had longer external threads on their extensions so I had to make longer internal threads on the justGG extensions to meet the external ones of the older GGTS. Also some GGTS extensions had shorter external threads. So I preferred to make longer internal threads on justGG extensions to meet all previous external GGTS extensions. Also shorter external threads of justGG extensions will fit well on GGTS old extensions but on its caps too (like AD cap or Stealth)
The reason that I made tubes like this is that some older GGTS had longer external threads on their extensions so I had to make longer internal threads on the justGG extensions to meet the external ones of the older GGTS. Also some GGTS extensions had shorter external threads. So I preferred to make longer internal threads on justGG extensions to meet all previous external GGTS extensions. Also shorter external threads of justGG extensions will fit well on GGTS old extensions but on its caps too (like AD cap or Stealth)
Last edited:
You were the one of the lucky ones somo, Vasillis sent some with fedex and some via normal post to see how good fedex is lol. So I was one of the unlucky ones.
I don get it, it's been 48hrs since last scanned at Heathrow and still showing Heathrow. I thought I'd definitely get it today but doesn't look like it
mine's shipped pn 3/10 & by today i got this
item in conta IPS 10-10-2013 14:42 IPS (area)
anyone know what is IPS?
item in conta IPS 10-10-2013 14:42 IPS (area)
anyone know what is IPS?
- Status
