Ugh he kills me. I watched the kanger subtank review and he could've easily knocked 30minutes off and still given the same info. First and last I'll watch, I fast forwarded half of it
Ugh he kills me. I watched the kanger subtank review and he could've easily knocked 30minutes off and still given the same info. First and last I'll watch, I fast forwarded half of it
Phil does a very comprehensive and informative review, which can be long-winded for sure. He seems to be geared, and always has, for the more conventional or mass market vaper (if there is still such a thing). That said, he no longer reviews juices with a hh357 dripper, if he reviews them at all. And, he almost never uses a Provari anymore, which was a mainstay for a while.
I have also noticed that while he professes to disdain cloud chasing and sub-ohm vaping as unnessary and dangerous, he reviews things like the Atlantis and Kanger Subtanks, using DNA 30 or 40 devices. To be fair, he never reviews RBAs or mechs mods, with the exception of Kayfuns and such that excel above 1 ohm. He basically sticks to the "popular" devices with an emphasis on conventional vaping, which is fine.
But, I recall not so long ago that many of us said that our spinner or bulletproof Provari and a Vivi Nova (or pick your clearo) was perfectly good and satisfying. There's folks still using those kinds of devices, and that's cool. There's folks that moved on to rebuildables like Kayfuns that changed their minds but now this is perfectly fine and satisfying.... What a surprise.
And there are devices in the market now that are a next step, which are unnecessary beyond perfectly fine, that Phil is grudgingly covering, that if he doesn't, he may as well quit. But he isn't, because vaping is important and relevant to public health. So he is soldiering on and slowly taking on the latest tech, at least as far as battery holders. And he's thorough. But he's limited and therefore a bit less relevant and popular than he once was. If I want a review of say, a Lemo as to how it compares to a trusty Kayfun, for example, I have to go elsewhere. (I didn't choose that comparison at random; I see a lot of people trying to drill out the perfectly fine Kayfun to increase airflow. Why bother when it works great for some juices just as it is? Get one of the many other options out there for more airflow/lower ohm builds/dual coils etc. that can take advantage of the newer regulated and mechs out there.
So, what was my point? I forget hahaha. Oh, that Phil analyzes and demonstrates devices in great technical detail, which I appreciate if they are something I may be interested in. Other reviewers don't do that. He's just very narrow in his choice of devices. If I want to investigate something more "exotic" like the dozens of rbas and rtas on the market I have to go elsewhere, and while those reviewers do a good job on features and benefits, and specs, they don't cover the technical aspects as well as Phil. So there.[emoji12]
Jeez, what was THAT all about? [emoji1]
Its OK, I lost me too.I have no idea. You lost me.
anyone notice that twisted coils gunk up faster than single wire coils??

Only in the RSST... HA!!!
It stands to reason that since the twists in the coils hold more juice, they also collect more gunk. Does that sound reasonable?
Yes, and Yes. If you look closely at the Cyclops, the slots on the inside a 180* apart, but the exterior slot are about 120* apart. This way, it is possible to close off one side. Also, in between the two inner (180* apart) slots is a single air hole, I'm guessing 1mm in diameter. Too tight for me, I've turned to the one slot setting and am playing between 1/3 and 1/4 open. Easily 2mm of draw there.
anyone notice that twisted coils gunk up faster than single wire coils??
so you are basically saying HHV juice is gunky?
and... you have an RSST ?? too kewlll..![]()
Does the Original Svoemesto Kayfun have an O-ring at the fill port ? If so, what size ?