LOL. Yes!
Among the more surprising results of this thread is the irony that some of us have developed a greater appreciation of good synthetic tobacco than we had before the thread. One of the best uses of synthetic tobacco flavorings is as bases for RY4s, especially in Classic RY4s, where the balanced, unified flavor profile downplays the synthetic nature of their lab-based tobacco flavorings.
Of the 165-or-so RY4s retail RY4s I've reviewed and ranked on The Really Big RY4 Roundup thread, only 28 RY4s get an "A" or "A-" grade from me. Of those 28 top-rated RY4s, 24 are made with synthetic tobacco (14 Classics, 10 Customs), while only 4 are made with natural tobacco flavoring. (The ratio in the retail marketplace of synthetic tobacco RY4s to natural tobacco RY4s is about 8:1. As group, I grade the natural tobacco RY4s higher, because I think they're tastier overall than the average synthetic-based RY4. Clay's recent entry, N-E-T RY4.1, is another worthy contender among natural tobacco RY4s, most of which are very good. The synthetic-based RY4s are all over the map, from brilliant to dreadful.
That said, the Classic genre (with its synthetic Chineseyness, LOL) offers some terrific, delicious RY4s. The RY4 that was mentioned in the thread recently---Smokeless Image Volt RY4---that kicked off this diversion, is one of the best Classic RY4s ever made by the Chinese. Inexpensive, too! I don't know of any NET-based RY4s made in China, however. Natural tobacco RY4s seem to be exclusively an American invention, as is the whole genre of what is now called Custom or Modern RY4.
I was under the impression that Hangsen tobacco's are made with TA. Is their RY4 an exception ? Sorry, don't know too much about RY4's. Tried some Dekang and Hangsen RY4's a long time ago, and i thought they were better than some i had tried from my local vapeshops. Haven't had a synthetic RY4 for over a year. I have tried the Goodejuice and Quicknic and thought they were pretty good and kinda similar, just not my thing.