And what is wrong with an alternative? If Big
tobacco came out with a cigarette that was free of tar, ammonia, arcenic, carbon monoxide and 99% of the other harmful substances regular
tobacco contains AND it was easy to use, didn't create second-hand smoke, was affordable and palatable, would you tell people who can't or won't quit smoking to just keep using the regular tobacco, just because the new cigarette still has "some" harmful chemicals left?
That's like telling an obese person, who is trying to eat healthier, to just keep eating Ben & Jerry's, because frozen yogurt still contains "some" fat.