Bill I have to ask you this,
You stated in the 3rd to last paragraph of your post this =
" In preparing for meetings in July and this week, the FDA instructed TPSAC to focus its report on nonexistent, miniscule and hypothetical risks of dissolvables, but not to consider the health benefits that occur every time a smoker consumes a dissolvable tobacco product instead of a cigarette. "
My question is, why and how does the FDA instruct the TPSAC to focus on what the FDA say's to focus on ? Instead of focusing on what you would like to focus on ? Am I missing something here ? and why in the heck would they NOT want you to consider the health benefits that occur every time a smoker consumes a dissolvable tobacco product instead of a cigarette.
Edit; Or is this what your stating towards that = Human rights, ethics, science and public health must no be compromised by abstinence-only policies and anti-tobacco propaganda.
I just want to be clear on my understanding of this
Thank You,
MWA
You stated in the 3rd to last paragraph of your post this =
" In preparing for meetings in July and this week, the FDA instructed TPSAC to focus its report on nonexistent, miniscule and hypothetical risks of dissolvables, but not to consider the health benefits that occur every time a smoker consumes a dissolvable tobacco product instead of a cigarette. "
My question is, why and how does the FDA instruct the TPSAC to focus on what the FDA say's to focus on ? Instead of focusing on what you would like to focus on ? Am I missing something here ? and why in the heck would they NOT want you to consider the health benefits that occur every time a smoker consumes a dissolvable tobacco product instead of a cigarette.
Edit; Or is this what your stating towards that = Human rights, ethics, science and public health must no be compromised by abstinence-only policies and anti-tobacco propaganda.
I just want to be clear on my understanding of this
Thank You,
MWA
Last edited: