Some folks have suggested a parallel between using a nicotine product instead of smoking on a long-term basis and methadone treatment for ...... addicts. Came across a very good explanation of the concept behind methadone.
Why methadone maintenance works
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]
[/FONT]Do you see the parallels?
Why methadone maintenance works
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]The two major reasons for the success of methadone maintenance are surely no secret. Methadone is legal; hence the addict who enters a methadone maintenance program casts off his role of hated and hunted criminal when he downs his first methadone tablet or glass of methadone spiked orange drink. And methadone is cheap. The cost of the usual dose--- 100 milligrams per day--- is ten cents. It is supplied the addict either free or (in some programs with ancillary services outside New York) for $10 to $14 per week.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]If morphine or ...... were legally dispensed at low cost, the same two advantages would be equally well achieved. Thus in those two respects the favorable results of methadone maintenance cannot be attributed solely to the methadone.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]Like morphine and ......, methadone is a narcotic and therefore, by definition, an addicting drug. This fact is often cited as a disadvantage. Indeed, newspapers, politicians, and even some physicians have expressed the hope that a nonaddicting drug for the treatment of ...... addiction can be found.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]This hope, however, is based on a misunderstanding. One main advantage of methadone is that it is addicting. For an addicting drug, it will be recalled, is one that an addict continues to take day after day and year after year.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]In fact, several nonaddicting drugs for the treatment of ...... addiction have already been tried out. Among them are the narcotic antagonists; cyclazocine and nalaxone are examples. An addict who injects ...... while on one of these drugs perceives no effect. Thus the antagonists, like methadone, are "blocking agents." But they are inferior to methadone in at least two other major respects.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]First, they do not assuage the postaddiction syndrome--- the anxiety, depression, and craving that recur for months and perhaps years after the last shot of ....... The contrast with methadone is readily visible. A psychiatrist who has had experience with both methadone and antagonist maintenance programs contrasts "the relaxed, jovial atmosphere of a methadone ward," where patients are free of the postaddiction syndrome, with "the tension, frustration, and anxiety that characterize a cyclazocine ward." [/FONT][FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]1[/FONT][FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman] Clearly methadone is in this respect a far more hopeful base for building social rehabilitation.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tms Rmn,Times New Roman]The other major difference is that since the antagonists are not addicting, a patient can stop taking them at will. * Most patients do stop taking them--- and then promptly return to black-market ....... The greater success of methadone results in considerable part from the fact that it is an addicting drug.[/FONT]
[/FONT]Do you see the parallels?