You could just wire up the battery and 510 outside a box and test it. Probably the only way to know if it's kaputt.
You could just wire up the battery and 510 outside a box and test it. Probably the only way to know if it's kaputt.
I have a board that has been at Evolv for a week and no word? Also, built another device for my brother that is experiencing screen issues? It's kind of a pain to take out! I have 2 more DNA40 boards that I have not wired and installed. Should I inquire of Evolv as to weather I should send those back to make sure there are no problems before I use them?
Any advice would be appreciated.....
Guys and Girls,
I want to make you aware of my Vapor Flask V2.5 DNA40 fiasco.
I made a rookie mistake by placing one of the batteries in - upside down (Woops)
Doesn't it suppose to have reverse battery protection?
It fried! A lot of SMOKE came out of it, one of the VTC4 batteries started to vent and the unit is now DEAD
Based on that experience, I can say: Vapor Flask V2.5 Does NOT have Reverse Battery Protection
It's going back to Vapor Flask for RMA. But it was having some intermittent screen issues any way.
Guys and Girls,
I want to make you aware of my Vapor Flask V2.5 DNA40 fiasco.
I made a rookie mistake by placing one of the batteries in - upside down (Woops)
Doesn't it suppose to have reverse battery protection?
It fried! A lot of SMOKE came out of it, one of the VTC4 batteries started to vent and the unit is now DEAD
Based on that experience, I can say: Vapor Flask V2.5 Does NOT have Reverse Battery Protection
It's going back to Vapor Flask for RMA. But it was having some intermittent screen issues any way.
![]()
I'm sorry to hear this. Let's make sure I have both oars in the water. The DNA 40 board is advertised as having reverse battery protection. I don't doubt it but have never tested it. Anyone? This leaves me to conclude ??? from your post that VF messed up the wiring somehow? I'm not an EE so don't hesitate to correct me.

Let's not forget regardless of temp control what we got here with the 40 vs the 30 at no extra cost for devices that have moved to the new board. Step down, reverse battery protection, lower ohms allowed, screen that does not stay on forever, 10 more watts, and the ability to try nickel builds to me was icing on the cake. I had a unit with a bad board myself and now that it has been fixed it has been perfect. I understand they had a bunch of boards with issues but how would beta testers be able to know they would receive and put out boards that had problems if theirs did not. Love how he rips reviewers in the past for not doing a correct in his eyes review and then he does this. Here is another person who will not waste time watching him and his ego do another video.
I guess, if I would have reversed both batteries accidentally, the Reverse Battery Protection would have saved it![]()
Most mods are single battery, and there is protection for putting that in wrong. The only way to protect dual batteries from just one upside down is with fuses or diodes. Those wouldn't be on or for the board. There can also be physical protection with contacts that will make up to the - but not the +.
Were I AMD, I'd ask for a replacement, anyway, because I bet most folks don't know what he just found out. Battery shorts like that are dangerous. Dual battery mod owners must pay attention and really should use the internal charger so they limit the opportunities to mess up.
So reverse battery protection only works if you put them BOTH in the wrong way?! Wow.
I'd say, the best reverse battery protection in the World is a century old idea to have the positive end nipple tipped. But Vapor Flask should at least, have installed a diode that would allow the current flow in only one direction between two batteries. IMHO
Guys and Girls,
I want to make you aware of my Vapor Flask V2.5 DNA40 fiasco.
I made a rookie mistake by placing one of the batteries in - upside down (Woops)
Doesn't it suppose to have reverse battery protection?
It fried! A lot of SMOKE came out of it, one of the VTC4 batteries started to vent and the unit is now DEAD
Based on that experience, I can say: Vapor Flask V2.5 Does NOT have Reverse Battery Protection
It's going back to Vapor Flask for RMA. But it was having some intermittent screen issues any way.
![]()
With a diode having a 0.7 volt drop if you are drawing 20amps you dissipate 14 watts in the diode while firing. This would require a large, heat sunk diode. It would also greatly decrease battery life. They could have installed some fuses. They would work much better. Mamu has some excellent suggestions on installing them in parallel mods. They could have required using nipple top batteries but then people would complain that they couldn't use their VTC5s. Folks complain lots about that with the provari and other mods that require nipple tops. Really, resettable, self healing fuses are the best way but they do increase the complexity of the mod and give another possible failure mode. Avoiding putting batteries in backwards is really the best solution. It is hard to prevent thermal runaway when batteries are connected + to -. You could only buy DNA40s with single batteries so the reverse protection will prevent problems. Or an XPV without easily user replaceable batteries.
Lol. The flask is anything but a manufacturing masterpiece. Quite the contrary in fact.
In any case the reverse battery does work. Just tried it on my rDNA. Like what's been mentioned, it's only because the 2 batteries were put in diff directions for a dual mod.
Burping out loud using Tapatalk

