the current doesn't go through the cap at all on the radius![]()
I'm right behind you! Then again, I'm afraid to say that if ProVape makes it, I'm likely to buy itI will be the first guinnea pig beta tester for a Provari Squonker!
![]()
Ding, ding, ding! Yuup.well....when someone asks or comments on the radius...it is easier to reply in the thread it was asked, then answer in the radius thread and tag them![]()
I've lost count of how many times I've seen this sideXside pic but do anyone of you remember Ignition? These bases used to be all the rage....what happened??? Seems in vaping, all we need is 24 hrs for something else to become the next hit wonder. Folks now once again clamoring for the SxS or am I missing something- ya'll just want one done by ProVape?
the plate and wire arent attached to the cap at all, but wired directly to the chipOf course it does, unless that plate and wire are not a part of it.
the plate and wire arent attached to the cap at all, but wired directly to the chip
It actually does mainly due to the fact that it is a direct to board connection and has a bit less resistance than going through the tube with a threaded section. The bottom plate conducts nothing. We're talking mili-ohms here but there is a difference. Personally I always wondered why they went with screws for the bottom plate and not cam lock bolts.I'm sure the Radius cap won't allow more electrons to flow compared to the Procyon cap on their allowed current.
But even if (as you say) the Radius offers more than X4 connection, I'm sure that if Provape gives us a device with X4 connection (Procyon), then it's safe enough. No need for complicated battery swaps and X40 or X400 connection.
I wonder if Procyon will be bigger than my ProVari Power Pro 26650
![]()
And for some reason I can't get this line outta my head....Don't drop the soap!Oh, The Things It Will Do... To your Provi Collection while yer sleepin!!!
w00 h00!!!
Refresh my memory but doesn't your job usually end up extending your stay? How much longer do you have til your 30 days is up?I'm working at a Nuclear plant and I hope my Procyon comes before this job ends, I want to see the Security face when I send my Stealth through the X-ray machine![]()
It actually does mainly due to the fact that it is a direct to board connection and has a bit less resistance than going through the tube with a threaded section. The bottom plate conducts nothing. We're talking mili-ohms here but there is a difference. Personally I always wondered why they went with screws for the bottom plate and not cam lock bolts.
Weh.But we should really stop the Radius discussion on this Procyon thread..
We should focus on freedom - the right to be free from a menu that controls the user.
Like like some of the recently shipped 2.5 blems.
There's no need for a USB connector. The battery contact on the PCB also doubles as a way to access the chipset to perform the update. All you have to do is change the connection protocol and make a cable with a USB connection on one end, and the same connector that's on the cable that hooks up to the ProVari updater on the other end. Problem solved and everybody's happy. How hard can it be? Your decision to make a proprietary updater box and use of a serial cable made things far more difficult and expensive than they have to be. Now, here's a question for you Provape guys, if I can come up with a way to make a tube mod user update-able, why can't the aerospace engineers working for you do the same thing?Same update process as the P3 since we don't have room for a USB connection on the tubes.
Like like some of the recently shipped 2.5 blems.
Looks cool though. IME, honest wear on just about anything is a surefire indicator that the device is solid and reliable.